|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 | |
|
Grade 3
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maryville, Tennessee
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,678
|
Quote:
For example, in the Kentucky Derby, unless there is a foreign-based entry, chances are that none of the horses will have gone the distance. Thus, all are unknowns and one takes one's chances. But take a race like the January 5 race #6 at AQU... The 2 horse has never been in a route. The 4 horse shows no dirt routes. The 5 horse shows no dirt races at all. That's three unknowns which in this case are too many for me. Sure, I could force a play, among the dirt horses the 9 horse looks fairly good and the morning line is 7/2. On top of that, my own decision model for the distance does not show any top-ranked factor to achieve a 40% or better win percentage. Meanwhile, at six furlongs, the top ranked CPR and BL horses have been winning at a rate of 48%. As long as I can get fair odds, that's where I focus. That's my comfort zone. I'm of the mind that anyone can up their winning percentage just by learning what to avoid. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Pace | rmath | General Discussion | 18 | 11-10-2011 02:37 PM |
| "Which 2 do I bet? Doc Sartin's wagering guidelines | RichieP | RDSS | 11 | 12-03-2009 09:09 PM |
| Contender/paceline troubles? | RichieP | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 0 | 11-06-2009 07:52 AM |
|