Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) > Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum
Get RDSS
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-02-2012, 08:31 PM   #21
mrhug
Grade 3
 
mrhug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maryville, Tennessee
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrhug View Post
I have another question about maiden line selection where there are 2 or less FTS. If a horse has only one race to show, do you use it for analysis in your program even if it does not qualify as a contender based on todays race (distance, track, surface,beaten lengths, etc.) I just ran across a race where a one race horse won a 6.5F race and his only race was a 5F where he was beaten 16 lengths. Same track and surface. When I went back and included him and 2 other one race horses, the other 2 did not qualify as being within 5 points of top CPR horse or were not 1 or 2 EPR,LPR. However, the one race horse who won was within 5 of top CPR horse, #1 EPR and was top TE horse.
I would love to still get an answer to this question if anyone has one.
mrhug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2012, 09:52 PM   #22
clore1030
Grade 1
 
clore1030's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrhug View Post
The number one thing I am struggling with is when to pass a race. Thanks again for all the help you give.
Merry Christmas to you and yours.
Melvin
Besides the obvious reason of passing when you can't get a decent price, my suggestion is to pass when there are too many unknowns. Just how many is "too many" will depend on the situation.

For example, in the Kentucky Derby, unless there is a foreign-based entry, chances are that none of the horses will have gone the distance. Thus, all are unknowns and one takes one's chances.

But take a race like the January 5 race #6 at AQU...

The 2 horse has never been in a route.
The 4 horse shows no dirt routes.
The 5 horse shows no dirt races at all.

That's three unknowns which in this case are too many for me. Sure, I could force a play, among the dirt horses the 9 horse looks fairly good and the morning line is 7/2.

On top of that, my own decision model for the distance does not show any top-ranked factor to achieve a 40% or better win percentage.

Meanwhile, at six furlongs, the top ranked CPR and BL horses have been winning at a rate of 48%. As long as I can get fair odds, that's where I focus. That's my comfort zone. I'm of the mind that anyone can up their winning percentage just by learning what to avoid.
clore1030 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Pace rmath General Discussion 18 11-10-2011 02:37 PM
"Which 2 do I bet? Doc Sartin's wagering guidelines RichieP RDSS 11 12-03-2009 09:09 PM
Contender/paceline troubles? RichieP Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 0 11-06-2009 07:52 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 PM.