|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| Races of Interest *Detailed* Discussion of Races – Screen shots, decisions, post-mortems |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
Parx Pace Line Preview
Please Help me out if you have any comments
This is not a great race but I.... Here is race 6 today from Parx I have made my paceline selections and added my comments in the little notepad box near the apv/cr ratings bottom right of screen shot I come up wit the 4 and 8 The 6 is a problem horse for me so any help will only make things better for me as i look to improve Thank You in advance Bill |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
horse
3 4 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
horse
6 7 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Grade 1 Aspiree
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 678
|
Parx r6
Hi Bill,
I hope I can provide some insight on the 6. IMHO (and it is very humble). The 6 is OFF-FORM. Check the last 3 races with declining TE and increasing MED... (PP below). I would not consider this horse a win candidate. Looking at my top RDSS contenders I like the 4-2. Not sure about the 8. And if you consider V% tiers 4 (0.0), 2 (1.2) and 8 (1.4) I would favor the 2 and 4 over the 8 ALSO..... The 3 did not make it to my top 5 RDSS but New Pace has the 3 has the pace setter with a near Early Dominance (57%). I also used the tie breaking speed calculation that Dave Schwartz presented and the 2-3-4 rated higher than the 8. So it is a close call to exclude the 8 from contention but I am going by the stats. So I would consider the 3 top choices to be 2-3-4. Standard BTW two best odds. GL/GS Ernie Last edited by SilentRun; 11-20-2011 at 01:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
well that worked
The 8 ran like a champ
x |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 600
|
Nice Hit Bill
That was a nice one. Congrats. I approach these things from a matchup point of view. Here's what I saw:
The 2 looked like a non-contender to me. He made no move in any of the sprints. Looks like it didn't hurt to put him in. I agree with you and Ernie on the 6. Four of the last five races are bad. Non-contender. I would not have used the last line on the 5. Vey slow pace and he was closer to the lead than he figured to be in this race. The third line back is the one I would have chosen. Eyeballing the race, I thought it would run sustained. I picked the 5 who ran second. Then I looked back and saw the 8 ran 1:11 to six furlongs twice when no one else could run better than 1:13.1 in routes. A 2 second edge. You don't see that everyday. Keep it up. Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Grade 1 Aspiree
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 678
|
Bill,
Nice win on the 8....I over analyzed myself out of a win..the 8 was top on the RDSS food chain best TE....I need a time out. Ernie |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
Thank you Tim and Ernie
I hope to be doing more of these. I hope they are helpful to the methodology group |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
|
Bill,
Nice hit and yes they are very helpful. Jeff |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Grade 1 Aspiree
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 678
|
Quote:
Posting races where there is group participation is always helpful where you can see varying points of view. It is also a learning opportunity but only if the person explains the reason(s) for their picks as most participants do. It brings forth the power of synergism where the input of a group will generally produce better results than an individual. Ernie |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Parx Pace line Pattern Problem Pick | Bill V. | Classic Sartin Programs - Support, Discussion | 10 | 10-18-2011 07:51 PM |
| Time for some help | Bill V. | RDSS | 144 | 09-30-2010 11:48 AM |
| Major vs. Minor tracks | Bill P | General Discussion | 109 | 04-05-2010 03:23 PM |
| Jim Bradshaw's 5 Step Approach to learning the Matchup | RichieP | Hat Check - How Can We Help You? | 1 | 05-25-2009 09:52 AM |
| Paceline selection | AAcoolguy | General Discussion | 44 | 07-27-2008 08:42 AM |
|