Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > Races of Interest
Get RDSS
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

Races of Interest *Detailed* Discussion of Races – Screen shots, decisions, post-mortems

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-20-2011, 11:53 AM   #1
Bill V.
The egg man
 
Bill V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
Parx Pace Line Preview

Please Help me out if you have any comments

This is not a great race but I....
Here is race 6 today from Parx I have made my paceline selections
and added my comments in the little notepad box near the apv/cr
ratings bottom right of screen shot

I come up wit the 4 and 8

The 6 is a problem horse for me so any help will only make things better
for me as i look to improve

Thank You in advance
Bill

Name:  Ent.png
Views: 677
Size:  36.0 KB

Name:  1H.png
Views: 681
Size:  60.9 KB

Name:  2H.png
Views: 668
Size:  87.2 KB
Bill V. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 11:56 AM   #2
Bill V.
The egg man
 
Bill V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
horse

3 4 5

Name:  3H.png
Views: 573
Size:  62.1 KB

Name:  4H.png
Views: 593
Size:  58.8 KB

Name:  5H.png
Views: 637
Size:  59.1 KB
Bill V. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 11:58 AM   #3
Bill V.
The egg man
 
Bill V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
horse

6 7 8

Name:  6H.png
Views: 601
Size:  60.8 KB
Name:  H7.png
Views: 595
Size:  60.8 KB
Name:  8H.png
Views: 649
Size:  62.6 KB
Bill V. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 01:09 PM   #4
SilentRun
Grade 1 Aspiree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 678
Parx r6

Hi Bill,

I hope I can provide some insight on the 6. IMHO (and it is very humble).
The 6 is OFF-FORM. Check the last 3 races with declining TE and increasing MED... (PP below). I would not consider this horse a win candidate.

Looking at my top RDSS contenders I like the 4-2. Not sure about the 8. And if you consider V%
tiers 4 (0.0), 2 (1.2) and 8 (1.4) I would favor the 2 and 4 over the 8 ALSO.....
The 3 did not make it to my top 5 RDSS but New Pace has the 3 has the pace setter with a near Early Dominance (57%).
I also used the tie breaking speed calculation that Dave Schwartz presented and the 2-3-4 rated higher than the 8.
So it is a close call to exclude the 8 from contention but I am going by the stats.

So I would consider the 3 top choices to be 2-3-4. Standard BTW two best odds.

GL/GS

Ernie
Attached Images
  

Last edited by SilentRun; 11-20-2011 at 01:17 PM.
SilentRun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 10:23 PM   #5
Bill V.
The egg man
 
Bill V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
well that worked

The 8 ran like a champ

Name:  bets.png
Views: 612
Size:  1.9 KB

x
Name:  results.png
Views: 616
Size:  188.6 KB
Bill V. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 10:46 PM   #6
Capcondo
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 600
Nice Hit Bill

That was a nice one. Congrats. I approach these things from a matchup point of view. Here's what I saw:

The 2 looked like a non-contender to me. He made no move in any of the sprints. Looks like it didn't hurt to put him in.

I agree with you and Ernie on the 6. Four of the last five races are bad. Non-contender.

I would not have used the last line on the 5. Vey slow pace and he was closer to the lead than he figured to be in this race. The third line back is the one I would have chosen.

Eyeballing the race, I thought it would run sustained. I picked the 5 who ran second. Then I looked back and saw the 8 ran 1:11 to six furlongs twice when no one else could run better than 1:13.1 in routes. A 2 second edge. You don't see that everyday.

Keep it up.

Tim
Capcondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 10:53 PM   #7
SilentRun
Grade 1 Aspiree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 678
Bill,

Nice win on the 8....I over analyzed myself out of a win..the 8 was top on the RDSS food chain best TE....I need a time out.

Ernie
SilentRun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 11:34 PM   #8
Bill V.
The egg man
 
Bill V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
Thank you Tim and Ernie
I hope to be doing more of these.
I hope they are helpful to the methodology group
Bill V. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2011, 06:27 AM   #9
shoeless
Grade 1
 
shoeless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Bill,


Nice hit and yes they are very helpful.


Jeff
shoeless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2011, 08:21 AM   #10
SilentRun
Grade 1 Aspiree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 678
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill V. View Post
Thank you Tim and Ernie
I hope to be doing more of these.
I hope they are helpful to the methodology group
Bill,

Posting races where there is group participation is always helpful where you can see varying points of view. It is also a learning opportunity but only if the person explains the reason(s) for their picks as most participants do. It brings forth the power of synergism where the input of a group will generally produce better results than an individual.

Ernie
SilentRun is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parx Pace line Pattern Problem Pick Bill V. Classic Sartin Programs - Support, Discussion 10 10-18-2011 07:51 PM
Time for some help Bill V. RDSS 144 09-30-2010 11:48 AM
Major vs. Minor tracks Bill P General Discussion 109 04-05-2010 03:23 PM
Jim Bradshaw's 5 Step Approach to learning the Matchup RichieP Hat Check - How Can We Help You? 1 05-25-2009 09:52 AM
Paceline selection AAcoolguy General Discussion 44 07-27-2008 08:42 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 AM.