|
Google Site Search | Get RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-01-2010, 10:11 PM | #1 |
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
Doc gets it again
Win or place in a grade 1 or 2
Sustained or late running style Way to go Super Saver you had what Doc said it takes No big brown or mine that bird this time as is almost always the case the guidelines stand up |
05-02-2010, 01:03 AM | #2 |
Grade 1 Aspiree
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 678
|
|
05-02-2010, 01:48 AM | #3 | |
Grade 1 Aspiree
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 678
|
Quote:
"S" but the interesting situation is, the horse was the 2nd most early amoungst all "S" and late contenders. This is supported by the energy panel and the E/L graph. So I concluded that he was early. This race supports that the "FPLR" Matchup concept is valid for all distances. Maybe someone who has stats on this or is more familiar with the Matchup than I am can comment on this. Ernie |
|
05-03-2010, 03:27 AM | #4 | |
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,292
|
Quote:
I did not check for FPLR, but my conclusion illustrates that whether the winner was FPLR or not, it was clearly the best first fraction and second call horse going into the race. Best first fraction speed is a formidable weapon at any distance. Hope this is of some value to you.
__________________
"It's suppose to be hard. If it was easy, everybody would do it." Jimmy Dugan, A League of Their Own |
|
05-03-2010, 06:57 AM | #5 |
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
energy
Hello guys
You are making good points . What Doc calls Early or late is how the horse uses its total energy In my first screen shot in post #1 I made the error of only showing the energy panel under the pp's It does show Super savers computer generated running style that is its energy distribution as being an Sus Here is a better shot of what Doc would have guided us to look for Notice the "other than early" running styles and all the sticks on the Early late graph are on the late side this along with the Grade 1 place make super saver a contender as per Doc's guide lines Good skill in catching the winner Bill |
05-03-2010, 07:28 AM | #6 | |
Grade 1 Aspiree
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 678
|
Quote:
in every race going forward. I guess you can also say that "FPLR" is a subset of this. Ernie |
|
05-03-2010, 07:38 AM | #7 | |
Grade 1 Aspiree
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 678
|
Quote:
as usual. I am still kicking myself for not including Ice Box in my exacta also an "S" contender with competitive TE. Ernie |
|
05-03-2010, 07:57 AM | #8 |
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
there will be more
Hey its just one race
as an old friend of Richie and myself named Mac used to say "there will be more" This race also hits home another Doc tidbit The horse that looks early positionaly but uses its energy sustained is the best bet |
05-03-2010, 10:23 AM | #9 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC and San Diego
Posts: 627
|
The latest guidelines I have from Doc, which I believe are sometime around 2004, said to IGNORE running style as part of the Derby 'capping procedure.
I have never been able to derive much benefit from modeling computer generated running styles based on energy distribution. Visual running styles a la Hat or Brohamer are much more useful in trying to project the pace and the match up. For example, when you cap a turf race with turf pacelines, many times you get all computer generated running styles as sustained, as that's the typical energy distribution, even if the horse is visually early. Having all runners as sutained doesn't tell you much in and of itself. Looking at last year's Derby in retrospect, Mine That Bird came out of the FPLR, which was the Sunland Derby looking at the first and 2nd calls and as I recall, he ran fairly close to that pace (4th?). His computer generated style was Early, which was not his visual style or how he won the Derby. Super Saver also came out of the FPLR tandem by a tick at the first call. Ice Box came out of the tandem which was a tick slower at the 1st call. These were the 2 fastest FPLR's. Super was S/P Presser and Ice was Sustained (using the EnGen in EXDC). Super Saver is designated Early by AOdds, which is the correct call. Although a small sample, his 2 wins are wire to wire and he has shown a little fight. His last race showed hints that he might be able to early press the pace with success, as he closed some lengths from the 2nd call to the stretch as I recall. Looks like he was able to relax and made a nice move at the top of the lane. For the record, I completely ignored Mine That Bird last year, even though AOdds had yellow highlights on both his 1st and 2nd calls, meaning they were the fastest adjusted for variant and b l's. I was seduced by the "hossy beliefs" that his speed figs were too low and he came out of a non graded prep. I did not have time to cap the Derby this year due to family commitments. It seems that the Hat would have nailed this race and his tenets carried forward by Rich are alive and well. Congrats to all who had Super Saver, even for $2. Calvin Borel is amazing at CDX. |
05-03-2010, 11:04 AM | #10 |
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
From follow up 33
add Top two SP
FPLR Win or place Grade 1-2 I'll take those odds |
|
|