|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| Matchup Discussion Matchup Discussion and Practice |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#4 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 600
|
Good race Pete.
Tandems: 24 48.4 1:14.3 1:46.2 with the 1,7,8 24.1 48.1 1;14.1 1;41.1 with the 2 and 4 24.0 48.2 1:14.4 150.3 with the 2 and 8 I am going to use the last line of the 1 as the pace. 24 48.4 1:14.3 1:46.2. It may a bit faster early because of the 5. It looks like the 1 and 5 will be the pace with the 4 and 9 just behind. I think it will go OTE. Here is the field: 1: E Out 2: P Ran S 3 and 9 races back. Can handle 24.0 23.3 and 23.4. Contender 3: Out 4: E/P Out 5: E Out 6: L Too far back. 7: L Too far back. 8: L Out of fastest tandem. In for now. 9: E/P Out 10: Needs 24.3 to compete. Out. For me, this race comes down to the 2 and 8. The 8 is late and can't handle the early fractions the 2 can. The 2 is my pick. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| match | Paul Del Vacchio | Matchup Discussion | 5 | 12-16-2010 02:49 PM |
| Jim Bradshaw's 5 Step Approach to learning the Matchup | RichieP | Hat Check - How Can We Help You? | 1 | 05-25-2009 09:52 AM |
| Patten Match; 2Jan9Aqu; that's today | chris | Selections | 4 | 01-02-2009 04:10 PM |
| The Match Up and destrcutive interference | Tim Y | General Discussion | 0 | 12-06-2008 09:10 PM |
| The Match Race that never was | Tim Y | General Discussion | 0 | 12-04-2008 08:34 PM |
|