|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| Races of Interest *Detailed* Discussion of Races – Screen shots, decisions, post-mortems |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#10 | |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,292
|
Quote:
Someone wrote to me and asked about my take on the derby. In response, I simply provided them with the "top 5" (25% of the field) in a few categories. Unlike most people, I am concerned with each horses "early" position. The top 5 in that category were #'s 3,6,14,15,19, in post position order. I did not consider #9 (Trinniberg) as this horse was just an annoyance in this race. I also provided them with the "top 5" horses based on final time. Those horses were the #'s 5,6,8,10,19, again, in post position order. You can see three things from this; 1 - the winner and the second horse were among the 5 best first call position horses. 2 - the winner, place horse and show horse were among the the 5 best final time horses. 3 - the #11 and #15 were NOT among the top 5 final time horses So these findings tend to confirm the findings through ENERGY.
__________________
"It's suppose to be hard. If it was easy, everybody would do it." Jimmy Dugan, A League of Their Own |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RDSS1 and the Kentucky Derby | Ted Craven | RDSS | 11 | 05-04-2012 07:32 PM |
| Races of the Derby Trail , Can we look them over? | pktruckdriver | Races of Interest | 10 | 03-10-2012 06:26 PM |
| RDSS & Kentucky Derby | Ted Craven | RDSS | 0 | 04-29-2010 07:22 AM |
| Sartin Followup study | RichieP | General Discussion | 20 | 12-03-2009 09:08 AM |
| Release Notes - Version 0.98.7 | Ted Craven | RDSS Info, Reference | 2 | 07-17-2009 11:09 AM |
|