Rdss new feature - Page 4 - Pace and Cap

RichieP · 02-13-2008, 02:57 PM

First non-maiden race on Turfway's card this afternoon. RAW data with lines selected by software.

screen shot #1 shows original pace lines with running styles marked over on right. Visual there are 2 earlies

Screen shot #2 shows RAW velocity screen. Look who is on top with virtually identical 1c and 2c velocities. Our 2 POSITIONAL earlies. So in THIS race both positional and velocity reads are AGREEING and pointing to the distinct possibility of a fight among the earlies that neither will survive and win man.

Distinct possibility of an "other than early" outcome for the winner?

Screen shot #3 shows our RAW early/late reads for the horses. Now follow me please. IF we are looking "ote" confidently for the WIN there are 2 "ote" guys right on top correct?
a) looking at the RAW Epr who is closer to the pace 3 or 4?
b) looking at the overall RAW total number who is the FASTER horse 3 or 4?

Screen shot #4 shows result chart ok? Look HOW the race ran. What 2 horses went to the lead and fought only to die later on?

What style did WIN the race?

WHO was the superior "ote" horse looking at our "aids" or matching "tools"?

sonofabit** this is cool man. Possibilities of a spot play where matching positional and velocity reads lead to a more confident wager maybe??

Yea I know "big deal Rich the horse paid 2/1".

I'll stop here. Dream big and then make it happen as my mentor says

Ciao

RichieP · 02-13-2008, 03:35 PM

Here is the next non maiden affair at Turfway.

I removed 1 horse because his last 2 races was beaten more than 23 lengths against paces slower than his power line selection. 2 seconds and a capper sees this immediately.For clarity keep him and he is on top.

Notice the very different makeup of the race matchup both positionally and velocity wise. I want spot plays.

Same 4 screen shots as above to be consistent.

ok

Condor · 02-13-2008, 05:04 PM

would the two hores that run second in each race be consiterd the best counter energy horse.?

mufasa · 02-13-2008, 05:25 PM

Rich, I just noticed on your Velocity output a choice for POR or POH. Nice. Will this allow me to switch back and forth without having to necessarily re-compute or go out and back in? Ted is really on fire with some of these seemingly very helpful handicapping/analysis tools.

Robert

Ted Craven · 02-13-2008, 05:30 PM

Sorry to dampen the fire a bit

- that POR vs POH Velocity screen is not part of the next update (still in the works...).

Ted

mufasa · 02-13-2008, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ted Craven

Sorry to dampen the fire a bit - that POR vs POH Velocity screen is not part of the next update (still in the works...).

Ted

No problem Ted you have given us allot to work with already as to the upcoming update. But, when you do include the ability to switch between POR and POH it will be like a switch right, or perhaps this would not be such a simple thing requiring recomputation of the program.

Thanks for all of your hard work,

Robert

Ted Craven · 02-13-2008, 05:51 PM

It might be 2 separate screens, or one combined screen showing both POH and POR, with differential, Running Style, QSP, graphed. Most likely not as is.

Thanks Robert, should be fun!

Ted

RichieP · 02-13-2008, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Condor

would the two hores that run second in each race be considered the best counter energy horse.?

First off welcome Condor!

If you are referring to the 2 Turfway races from today I'd say that race 3 is a personal call based on individual user interpretation while the place horse in race 5 is more obvious counter horse to the winner's energy distribution.

Hope this makes some sense. Do they look like the counter guys to you? Interesting in that to be honest I wasn't thinking or looking at this aspect as I was so tied up with the winner's stuff Condor.

Your feedback most appreciated
Richie

Condor · 02-13-2008, 06:49 PM

Thanks Richie. love the matchup and the way you lay it out so clear.

shoeless · 02-13-2008, 08:14 PM

Ted,Dont you think your putting to many things in your program?I think the more you add the more it confuses people just like Synthesis did.Anyway I hope you will be able to profit soon from all the hard work your doing.Jeff

02-13-2008, 02:57 PM	#31
RichieP Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 7,019	First non-maiden race on Turfway's card this afternoon. RAW data with lines selected by software. screen shot #1 shows original pace lines with running styles marked over on right. Visual there are 2 earlies Screen shot #2 shows RAW velocity screen. Look who is on top with virtually identical 1c and 2c velocities. Our 2 POSITIONAL earlies. So in THIS race both positional and velocity reads are AGREEING and pointing to the distinct possibility of a fight among the earlies that neither will survive and win man. Distinct possibility of an "other than early" outcome for the winner? Screen shot #3 shows our RAW early/late reads for the horses. Now follow me please. IF we are looking "ote" confidently for the WIN there are 2 "ote" guys right on top correct? a) looking at the RAW Epr who is closer to the pace 3 or 4? b) looking at the overall RAW total number who is the FASTER horse 3 or 4? Screen shot #4 shows result chart ok? Look HOW the race ran. What 2 horses went to the lead and fought only to die later on? What style did WIN the race? WHO was the superior "ote" horse looking at our "aids" or matching "tools"? sonofabit** this is cool man. Possibilities of a spot play where matching positional and velocity reads lead to a more confident wager maybe?? Yea I know "big deal Rich the horse paid 2/1". I'll stop here. Dream big and then make it happen as my mentor says Ciao Attached Images __________________ "Grampy I'm talking to you!"

02-13-2008, 03:35 PM	#32
RichieP Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 7,019	Here is the next non maiden affair at Turfway. I removed 1 horse because his last 2 races was beaten more than 23 lengths against paces slower than his power line selection. 2 seconds and a capper sees this immediately.For clarity keep him and he is on top. Notice the very different makeup of the race matchup both positionally and velocity wise. I want spot plays. Same 4 screen shots as above to be consistent. ok Attached Images __________________ "Grampy I'm talking to you!"

02-13-2008, 05:30 PM	#35
Ted Craven Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada Posts: 9,251	Sorry to dampen the fire a bit - that POR vs POH Velocity screen is not part of the next update (still in the works...). Ted __________________ RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™ Last edited by Ted Craven; 02-13-2008 at 05:48 PM.

02-13-2008, 05:51 PM	#37
Ted Craven Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada Posts: 9,251	It might be 2 separate screens, or one combined screen showing both POH and POR, with differential, Running Style, QSP, graphed. Most likely not as is. Thanks Robert, should be fun! Ted __________________ RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Aqueduct feature	Turf Speculator	Selections	4	02-09-2008 11:54 PM
Proposed Feature for RDSS	Buzz	RDSS	1	02-05-2008 07:25 AM
KEE Feature 4/13	Dumptruk	Selections	9	04-14-2007 09:47 AM
3/3 feature race question for Richie	dugoutgold	Matchup Discussion	4	03-05-2007 10:08 PM

02-13-2008, 05:04 PM	#33
Condor AlwNW1X Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 5	would the two hores that run second in each race be consiterd the best counter energy horse.?

02-13-2008, 05:25 PM	#34
mufasa Grade 1 Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 310	Rich, I just noticed on your Velocity output a choice for POR or POH. Nice. Will this allow me to switch back and forth without having to necessarily re-compute or go out and back in? Ted is really on fire with some of these seemingly very helpful handicapping/analysis tools. Robert

02-13-2008, 06:49 PM	#39
Condor AlwNW1X Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 5	Thanks Richie. love the matchup and the way you lay it out so clear.

02-13-2008, 08:14 PM	#40
shoeless Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 4,640	Ted,Dont you think your putting to many things in your program?I think the more you add the more it confuses people just like Synthesis did.Anyway I hope you will be able to profit soon from all the hard work your doing.Jeff