Morning Line Contenders Test

[Mitch44]

This coincides with what Lt1 and I say, which is anyone can get 50% winners pretty much doing nothing with RDSS. A few years back Mick asked me what the program will do with proper contenders and good pace lines. My reply to him was 50%.

Getting beyond 50% and the norm is a whole other issue. It takes much experience, skill, knowledge etc. But with those attributes one can meet or rise above 65%.Sartin's old standard to be a teacher was 65%. Most fail due to lack of discipline and money management. Human nature just wrecks havoc with discipline and the overwhelming majority fail in this principle. In sports this would be called the whole package. Few make it to the Pro's or big leagues, they just don't have the "whole package."

Swifity0x0 you did an excellent study and are well on your way. Trying to get players to do back studies, collect data etc. is worse than pulling teeth. When you mention work their gone, just allergic to it. Its all about them and instant gratification.

Swifty your future is bright and when you get an idea, test it to prove its worth. It'll serve you well. When you do things yourself, it remains in your brain housing group forever. WE learn by doing and practical application.

Finally, someone else's research is useless due to different contenders, pacelines, final decisions, discipline etc. No skin in the game or positive reinforcement with that and like money; "easy come and easy go."

Hard work paves the road to success.

Mitch44