|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#10 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: The Villages, Fl.
Posts: 3,872
|
A speed rating will out perform the fulcrum hands down for both winners and for "Getting the right horses into the computer." I.e. contenders. Why?? Because a SR considers the 3rd FR which is incorporated into final time. Also a SR considers the variant which is incorporated into it. The fulcrum does none of that PERIOD
There frequently can be several horses very close or in contention at the SC. The question is who will survive or be there at the finish. Many horses can jump out there for a commanding lead as we see this often. Then they hit a brick wall of distance and fade. Tired and spent horses that stop in the stretch. While a SR is far superior to the fulcrum, it is still inferior to other proven Factors for contenders and for winners. Until some old heads cast away old concepts and old programs they'll never get past 1st grade and residing in a corner with a dunce cap on. Adapt or perish. Forget about the fulcrum as its trash and unworthy of even mentioning, let alone honorable mention. Mitch44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NEW VIDEO - Jeebs' real-time handicapping process (TAM 1st, 3/8/17) | Jeebs | Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) | 7 | 03-11-2017 01:21 PM |
| New Sartin Video - Las Vegas 1993 | Ted Craven | General Discussion | 11 | 04-25-2013 03:42 PM |
| Sartin Video Seminar - Las Vegas 1993 | Ted Craven | Video Collection | 1 | 04-24-2013 04:25 PM |
| Doc Sartin Video Seminar - 1998 | Ted Craven | General Discussion | 1 | 02-09-2012 09:05 PM |
| Doc Sartin Video Seminar - 1998 | Ted Craven | Video Collection | 2 | 02-03-2012 11:59 AM |
|