Posting Selections

[For The Lead]

Originally Posted by Ted Craven

I agree with For The Lead and with his explanation. We have TWO separate Forums on purpose for race predictions: Selections and Races of Interest.

The Races of Interest Forum sub-header reads: '*Detailed* Discussion of Races – Screen shots, decisions, post-mortems' with emphasis added to the Details, the explanations and the screenshots (or other detailed explanations) part. Lety's keep it that way, and for the very same reasons reiterated by FTL and so well exemplified by Bill V and others over the years. If you don't feel like posting RDSS or other screenshots (or don't know how), at least please give the detailed - and educational - elements for your decision making process! (If you don't have time to post the details before the race runs but intend to follow up later with them - it's OK to post an initial simple prediction in this Forum as long as you follow up after with the details required for this Forum).

The Selections Forum on the other hand (as the sub-caption indicates) is simply for stating your race predictions - no details or explanations required, but any are also welcomed. Please also do the follow up courtesy to readers (like Partsnut today) of posting the results of your selections.

I'm not going to reclassify any posts. But let's re-commit to the different focuses of the 2 different race prediction Forums. Thanks Rmath for posting re that Saratoga race today - very nice outcome, congratulations! I watched and worked it (and the race before it) while testing the RDSS software update. Thanks Bill V for your detailed and educational comments. Thanks FTL for your thoughts and reminder re commitment to education and what makes P&C special.

Ted

Thank you for your comments.