|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) Interactive Teaching & Learning - Race Conditions, Contenders, Pacelines, Advanced Concepts, Betting ... |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#8 |
|
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
follow up 81
I prefer ( when of sound mind) not heavy medicated
![]() to pick the best TPR rating from the last 3 comparable races starting with line 1 But now I am forced to use the best of last three speed ratings or now perceptor and not go back more than 4 lines My ROi and hit rate is the same what ever way I use Doc's advice is to use the best speed rating of the last 3 or 4 when a non comparable line is one of the first 3 lines He write in the very same follow up (81) That he will go to the 3rd line when a horses last two races are not useable because of bad efforts But he shows no example What FTL is teaching is if the last line is not one of the horse best efforts in perceptor, or high speed rating It should will always have a valid excuse If it does not have a valid excuse than that horse is a non contender (in most races ) from the Doc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Class Still Matters | vderdak | Races of Interest | 3 | 03-10-2013 07:58 PM |
|