|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read
| Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) Interactive Teaching & Learning - Race Conditions, Contenders, Pacelines, Advanced Concepts, Betting ... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
AlwNW2X
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 25
|
Pizzola
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 644
|
Blast from the past...spending the afternoon browsing old threads to jog the old memory...semi-annual tune up. I forgot this one - Mike's power 3rd fraction. How was that calculated?
Say a horse runs against a 46 112 pace and gains 5 lengths from the half. Raw he gets a 25 3rd fraction. How did he adjust that? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Largo Fl.
Posts: 2,363
|
Mp
I believe he added back the 5 beaten lengths at the half
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 9,252
|
This is what RDSS does in its PF3 factor (Supplementary section on BLBL and Rx screens - same as Pizzolla's PPF). RDSS just shows the rank, and to do so calculates a modified 3rd (Power!
) fraction velocity and time (not shown). I have always been allergic to hyperbole ...Tom in your example, if you use .20 seconds per beaten length, you get 25 seconds as you say. I have no studies to show the situational effectiveness of PPF/PF3. Some people like it. It is not used in any other compounded factors. Ted
__________________
RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™ |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|