Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...)
Get RDSSMark Forums Read
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts

Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) Interactive Teaching & Learning - Race Conditions, Contenders, Pacelines, Advanced Concepts, Betting ...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-05-2018, 06:06 PM   #1
fastcharlie55
AlwNW2X
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 25
Pizzola

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch44 View Post
I only open up the PP's to get a line as the PP's or line tells me to go to another line Jeebs.

Pizzolla will use a 5 F turf race for a dirt route (taking its best in the chart) which I would never do that. His line picking is something I would never condone.



Also having tried his BM for a 90 day trial I would not recommend it at all. His pace numbers are the worse I've ever seen and Phase one or TPR are much netter and would outperform them. For a guy that started with Sartin he sure never evolved as far as pace numbers. I believe the flaw is in adjusting the 3rd FR or his PBS numbers. Adjusting those is not adjusting them to todays matchup but he adjusts them to the matchup of that race which is not todays matchup.

If your using RDSS you are using the best out there for pace handicapping.
Mitch44
Remember Pizzolla was a magician and he can make your money disappear.
fastcharlie55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2018, 01:40 AM   #2
Jeebs
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 909
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastcharlie55 View Post
remember pizzolla was a magician and he can make your money disappear.
:d :d :d
Jeebs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2021, 04:11 PM   #3
tom
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 644
Blast from the past...spending the afternoon browsing old threads to jog the old memory...semi-annual tune up. I forgot this one - Mike's power 3rd fraction. How was that calculated?

Say a horse runs against a 46 112 pace and gains 5 lengths from the half. Raw he gets a 25 3rd fraction. How did he adjust that?
tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2021, 09:01 AM   #4
raceman5
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Largo Fl.
Posts: 2,363
Mp

I believe he added back the 5 beaten lengths at the half
raceman5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2021, 03:29 PM   #5
Ted Craven
Grade 1
 
Ted Craven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 9,252
Quote:
Originally Posted by raceman5 View Post
I believe he added back the 5 beaten lengths at the half
This is what RDSS does in its PF3 factor (Supplementary section on BLBL and Rx screens - same as Pizzolla's PPF). RDSS just shows the rank, and to do so calculates a modified 3rd (Power! ) fraction velocity and time (not shown). I have always been allergic to hyperbole ...

Tom in your example, if you use .20 seconds per beaten length, you get 25 seconds as you say.

I have no studies to show the situational effectiveness of PPF/PF3. Some people like it. It is not used in any other compounded factors.

Ted
__________________

R
DSS -
Racing Decision Support System™
Ted Craven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 AM.