Quote:
Originally Posted by For The Lead
I'm going to have to agree with Tim Y.
The winner of the race accomplished the feat because it was the best based on the "match ups" in that race.
Now we all know that there will never be another race like the race the horse just won. With that in mind, how can a person just "dive in" thinking that a horse, coming off the winning race described, can beat today's match up when you don't know what today's match ups are?
|
How would Tim know? Last time we 'hooked' up he incorrectly identified a selection I had made as a 'hanger'. The horse won and paid $18. Here's someone picking 4 to 5 horses each race. Sounds like a man with an opinion.
He, and probably everyone here other than Richie, has no idea what I'm doing or what this angle really is. Looking at INDIVIDUAL running lines is not the best way to get the BIG PICTURE. This thread is just one way to try to get this point across.
We're only two days in. We have quite a while to go.