|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| Classic Sartin Programs - Support, Discussion Phase III/MPH, Synergism, Energy, Kgen, Entropy, Thoromation, Quad-Rater, PaceLauncher, Synthesis, Validator, Val4, Speculator, etc ... |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-23-2008, 02:43 PM
|
#1 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,151
|
3 Calls Vs 4 Calls
I wanted to know if anybody that has used Energy prefer one program over the other.Jeff
|
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 09:29 PM
|
#2 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 212
|
Jeff:
I Have Extensive Experience With Both Versions Of Energy. I Always Felt The Added Call Made Very Little Difference To Me And The Way I Interpret The Readouts. In The Final Analysis I Prefer "old" Energy Because Of The Ability To Change The Veriegate On The Rankings Screen. The Option Is Not Available In Energy Ii. Either Way, They Are Still Excellent Programs. Gary L. |
|
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 06:30 AM
|
#3 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,151
|
Gary,Nice to hear from I hope everything is going well.Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 07:36 AM
|
#4 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 212
|
Jeff:
Thank You. I Am Doing Well And Playing Tournaments. Leave For Las Vegas On Friday With Rdss And Energy. Hope All Is Well With You And Keep Working Those Races. Gary L. |
|
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 04:49 PM
|
#5 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,151
|
Gary,Best of luck in Vegas.Jeff
I do have a question for you and Houndog do you prefer Energy or Thoromatin |
|
|
|
|
03-25-2008, 07:54 AM
|
#6 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 212
|
Jeff;
Personally I prefer Energy. Thoromation is excellent and I used it for about one year, but I always found myself returning to Energy. Thoromation is a little more complex and took longer to get through all of the screens with about the same results as Energy. Gary L. |
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008, 02:02 PM
|
#7 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,258
|
Energy vs THOROMATION
I concur with Gary (Rxlawyer) on this. The Energy 3 call program works as well as it always has. The extra call as Gary has pointed out makes little or no difference.
Energy makes it harder to project horses and use an alternate adjustment. This may be a blessing in disguise as I have found out I was probably projecting too many horses and #2 adjusting slow horses in THOROMATION which was much easier to do than it is in Energy. Also I really like the EXDC Match-Up graphs in the Energy program. That with the emuv-smuv, and the UXR are powerful numbers. |
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008, 02:15 PM
|
#8 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,151
|
Houndog,I agree with you and Gary,that 2 adjust in KGEN with thoromation was driving me crazy.Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008, 03:09 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,643
|
Jeff
Quote:
Ditto |
|
|
|
|
|
03-30-2008, 08:27 AM
|
#10 | |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 223
|
Hello Gary:
Best of Luck to you and good travels while you are out there in LV.... Good Skill and have a wonderful time.  Vinnie Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Balancing Position calls with Beaten Lengths | VoodooFan | Hat Check - How Can We Help You? | 18 | 10-05-2006 09:08 PM |
|
Linear Mode
