Syn 2 RDSS testing

[Bill V.]

The race has been run
The 5 wins and pays about 3/1

The original raw lines did just a shade better than the Adjusted
and RDSS did fine with the 5 ranked 3rd

here are the screen

1st Raw
FW = 5, 6, 1 exacta top 2
DR = 7. 5. 1
**


Adjusted
FW = 7, 6,8
DR.= 7,5,6
**


RDSS line score

[Ted Craven]

Originally Posted by shoeless

Not able to open it says no file associated

Your browser needs to have an application plugged into it to enable viewing of MP4 video files.

Go here: www.videolan.org and download VLC Media Player. When you install it, it will offer a plugin to your default browser to view all manner of video and audio files, and can also be used in a standalone fashion (i.e. independent of a browser) to view the same types of files.

After you download and install Videolan, go to Bill's videos, right-click, choose Save As, Save to your computer, then view them using your newly downloaded VLC Player.

Ted

[shoeless]

Ted,

Thanks


Bill V

Nice hit

[Bill V.]

Thanks Jeff

Jeff I was a little off with my set up time
I used 45 and 103.3 (5ths)

The actual pace of race was 45.3 and 104.4 (5 ths)

Is there a guidline of how close Bob Purdy wanted the setup time
to be to the actual POR

Thanks
Bill

[shoeless]

Bill,

No the setup times are by the horses you have entered with the most like
pacelines at the distance they ran at.


Jeff

[Houndog]

Bill good example. I have one question for you. In your video with the unadjusted screen in RDSS you put in your set-up times and track record than exported to Synergism II. When you opened the unadjusted race you entered the set-up times and the track record again in Synergism II.

I was just wondering why you had to do this twice.

[Ted Craven]

Originally Posted by Houndog

Bill good example. I have one question for you. In your video with the unadjusted screen in RDSS you put in your set-up times and track record than exported to Synergism II. When you opened the unadjusted race you entered the set-up times and the track record again in Synergism II.

I was just wondering why you had to do this twice.

When exporting Raw (unadjusted) data, at the moment, you have to enter the Setup Times in Syn2. I also put Setup Time inputs in RDSS2 in anticipation of - in the future - being able to make one particular calculation using those Setup Times which right now Syn2 makes and which I don't have a formula for. I'll explain when I release the RDSS2 update (tomorrow?). I'm hoping that diligent testers will help me figure out the precise formula Syn2 is using to create a particular value in the export file (i.e. by iterative changing of the Setup Times, then comparing results). Then, when RDSS2 can create that value itself, you can enter the Setup Times in RDSS2 and won't have to do it again in Syn2. (Not sure if the same issue will exist with Syn3 - haven't got that far yet).

Just waiting for the heads-up from Bill V and Partsnut that the existing module is good to go for further testing. Then hopefully an update for everyone tomorrow.

This is just the beginning steps of this Synergism export - the rest will come following user feedback and my return from a vacation (September 15).

Ted

[Houndog]

Originally Posted by Ted Craven

When exporting Raw (unadjusted) data, at the moment, you have to enter the Setup Times in Syn2. I also put Setup Time inputs in RDSS2 in anticipation of - in the future - being able to make one particular calculation using those Setup Times which right now Syn2 makes and which I don't have a formula for. I'll explain when I release the RDSS2 update (tomorrow?). I'm hoping that diligent testers will help me figure out the precise formula Syn2 is using to create a particular value in the export file (i.e. by iterative changing of the Setup Times, then comparing results). Then, when RDSS2 can create that value itself, you can enter the Setup Times in RDSS2 and won't have to do it again in Syn2. (Not sure if the same issue will exist with Syn3 - haven't got that far yet).

Just waiting for the heads-up from Bill V and Partsnut that the existing module is good to go for further testing. Then hopefully an update for everyone tomorrow.

This is just the beginning steps of this Synergism export - the rest will come following user feedback and my return from a vacation (September 15).

Ted

Ted thanks for the quick response. You explained the reasoning perfectly.

[shoeless]

Bill,

Did a little more digging about the setup times

They are used in the program to make up a par variant


Also Synergism works best when all contenders put in have
like pacelines distance wise,this by Purdy.

[Bill V.]

Thank You Jeff
I will focus on the most predictive comparable pace lines
and average them for a set up time

Bill V