|
Google Site Search | Get RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read
General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-17-2018, 02:09 PM | #1 |
Abiding Student
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 711
|
Dave Schwartz comment and rmathie's big-field requirement
I'm watching some instructional videos from Dave Schwartz, an old Sartin guy, about his "1-2-3 System" which he asserts can be implemented with CPP (calculator, pencil and paper), no software required. Maybe. Maybe not. Regardless, I find all of his videos informative and he frequently makes statements that will stop me dead in my tracks.
Today's comment was, "There's not much difference between a 7-horse field and a 12-horse field." (Lesson 3, 0:19:21) I had to pause the video and replay it, several times actually. The context is the dependability of handicapping factors and it was an off-the-cuff remark that he made while discussing his par time charts. It immediately brought to mind rmathie's requirement of big fields. Richard won't bet a race unless there are 10 betting interests or more in it. He's adamant, too. Richard has developed a 4-factor system though years of statistical research and like a Seal Team sniper, he's deadly with it. The reason for his insistence on big fields is that the payouts are better because there's more confusion among the bettors and the money is spread over more horses. And his system is just as good whether it's a big field or a small field. So, why not play just the big fields with their more generous payouts? he argues. And that was the clap of thunder I heard with Dave's remark. If your approach is solid, you want to play the bigger fields. |
07-17-2018, 03:12 PM | #2 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 340
|
better but?
Yeah, bif fields are better, but getting fewer and far between. So I look for
value in smaller fields also, don't always find it, but no one says I have to play every race. |
07-18-2018, 01:40 PM | #3 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,676
|
Thanks
Thanks for the compliment Mick.
Lefty you are right; 10-12 horse fields are getting harder to find. On average I get 3 or less plays per day during the week and 5-6 on Saturdays,looking at 8-10 tracks. I do run races with 8 or 9 horses but rarely bet them . I use these shorter fields when I have a 10+ field with a DD on either side of my main play. Playing the top 2 in each race ( cost 4.00) I am hitting 50% on my DDs. Rmath |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|