|
Google Site Search | Get RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-24-2013, 02:12 PM | #1 |
AlwNW2X
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 25
|
bris race shapes vs track variant
I’m wondering if bris race shapes, like track variant, are good unless they’re bad.
Bris says “relative to par”, “average winners time” and 2 points per length implication is, like speed to par, there should be a baseline for comparison gulfstream - 8.5 turf same horse - same track - same distance - same surface example 1 - 01/2011 call1 - 50.8 - shape -13 (6.5 lengths slow) - means par near 49.5 call2 - 75.6 - shape -13 (6.5 lengths slow) - means par near 74.3 fin - 105.0 - variant -21 (10.5 lengths slow) - means par near 103 example 2 - 04/2011 call1 - 47.4 - shape +8 (4 lengths fast) - means par near 48.2 call2 - 71.1 - shape +11 (5.5 lengths fast) - means par near 72.1 fin - 102.0 - variant -5 (2.5 lengths slow) - means par near 101.5 If I understand this: looking at call2 75.6 - 71.1 = 4.5 seconds which is reported as shape going from -13 to + 11 (a 24 point or 12 length swing) using shape of 24, time diff should be between 1 to 1.5 seconds, not 4.5 using time, shape diff should be 8-10, not 24 Anyone know how/why they justify this? |
Tags |
race shapes |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Adjustments Question | Ted Craven | RDSS2 / FAQ's | 3 | 06-29-2014 03:22 PM |
UPDATED - Official Contest Rules, beginning AUGUST | Ted Craven | August Contest | 1 | 07-24-2012 10:09 PM |
Bad RDSS Race Data for several Euro Horses | Ted Craven | 2011 | 2 | 11-03-2011 04:24 PM |
Saratoga 2010 - Workbook for the Seminar | Ted Craven | 2010 | 9 | 08-28-2010 04:13 PM |
Jim Bradshaw's 5 Step Approach to learning the Matchup | RichieP | Hat Check - How Can We Help You? | 1 | 05-25-2009 09:52 AM |