Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...)
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) Interactive Teaching & Learning - Race Conditions, Contenders, Pacelines, Advanced Concepts, Betting ...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-26-2013, 11:48 AM   #11
Bill V.
The egg man
 
Bill V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
Distance

Dogkatcher I left out is, as part of "Doc's" guidelines, the line used should be within 1 furlong of today's distance (if possible). In this case the last two lines are 7f and 5.5f. With both races being recent and both races being "+" races and today's distance being 5.5f, it seems to me that following "Doc's" guidelines I should use line 2,.


Name:  Esthers classy lass.PNG
Views: 359
Size:  113.8 KB
Bill V. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 11:51 AM   #12
Bill V.
The egg man
 
Bill V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Appy View Post
I'm certainly not on Bill's experience level, but line 2 would have been my choice in this instance because it is what I call "conditionally perfect". That means there will be fewer adjustments necessary. IMO the fewer adjustments made the more accurate the line.

Hi Appy

Yes you are also correct and it is tied into using a pace line at a comparable distance and surface - same track - and no more than 1 furlong the less adjustments needed the better.

Bill
Bill V. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 01:07 PM   #13
dogkatcher
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 469
Thanks Bill, great explanation.
Thanks also for the kudos, but I pale
in your shadow of knowledge and skill.

All the Best,

John
__________________
"There is something about the outside of a horse
that is good for the inside of a man"
dogkatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 06:51 AM   #14
CaptDon100
Grade 2
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Fells Point MD
Posts: 95
Name:  MTN1127 8PP.PNG
Views: 305
Size:  105.2 KB

Name:  MTN1127 BL.PNG
Views: 298
Size:  67.7 KB

Name:  MTN1127 TPR.PNG
Views: 297
Size:  57.7 KB
CaptDon100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 07:07 AM   #15
Segwin
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 624


Hopefully you were all over the

Great payday!
__________________
Terry
Segwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 07:10 AM   #16
CaptDon100
Grade 2
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Fells Point MD
Posts: 95
This is my 1st time with the snipping tool, so I posted the info 1st.

After reading this post a couple times a day, I learned another thing to look out for. I picked the 2nd line for horse #8 and went back and
pick the 1st line to check what I saw. I didn't like using the route, but I had no choice. The TPR was 167.5 over 164.4, (That was from this post)
This was a MS 19 race and the race looked as if there would be some type of speed duel. But my opinion of the race felt right
What I wanted to know is, Is this what this post was teaching, or did I just get lucky.
CaptDon100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 08:29 AM   #17
Bill V.
The egg man
 
Bill V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
No comments

No sir, you have not grasped the points of this thread or any race in the teaching area.

Congratulations on being at the right place at the right time.
but this race is not indicative of what you will get on a consistent basis.


Rather than go into a long post, I will just say I would not have had this horse




Thanks
Bill
Bill V. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 09:48 AM   #18
Appy
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Flint Hills in Kansas, formerly from Montana
Posts: 334
CaptDon, I'm confused by you saying you "had no choice" but to use the route lines when I see lines 4 and 5 are both much nearer today's conditions. Seems to me you could have chose one of those lines and then used one of your route lines as a second in order to get a more complete picture of the Vicious probabilities.
I'm with you on valuing recency in line selection, but how the horse has performed in the past at today's condition is an equally valuable piece of info. I would be curious to see what it says if you do that (I don't have that card or I would do it myself). If I saw a segments screen showing results like that on a 20-1 horse I would be questioning my line selection, but if I got the same result using other lines, then it's a dash to the window!

In any event, if that horse won and you bought a ticket for it I'm really happy to see you get a big W.
__________________
Serious fun. www.cappersoverlay.com
Appy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 10:39 AM   #19
Bill V.
The egg man
 
Bill V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
Rude

Hi Appy and Captdon

I made this video when I first saw CapDons post this morning.
I decided not to post it at that time, because I felt it was not necessary to jump on a person who did give an effort to learn, I'm very appreciative of that effort .

The video does show each horses PP's but I don't show a final readout
because I only have a pace line for one horse and its not # 8 LOL
I apologize if the video seems like I'm not showing respect,

No Comment.mp4

Thanks
Bill
Bill V. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 01:07 PM   #20
CaptDon100
Grade 2
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Fells Point MD
Posts: 95
Thanks Bill V, I value your input, Thanks for taking the time.

When I went through the race and picked the lines,The BL screen picked
the #8 on top.
The reason I picked line 2 is because, it had TE of 165 within 45 days
and a 0.0 percept total. You are right there is nothing in his PP to show
that he is a winner. BUT he was the best of a race of crappy horses.
He was also a plus 2 in CPR. I checked to see if he had a chance since he was 20-1, That is why I put in the 1st line. Yes he had a bad line, but he was the best in that race.
I also thought that the 6 and the 4 would duel it out and that would let the 8 with the best turn time to make a move.
I'm not trying to make something out of nothing, I picked the best Pace line for each horse that I thought were the best choice for that race.
Had the 8 horse been the Fav with no odds, I would have passed. RDSS is not a Black Box, it did help me make up my mind that it was going to win.
The best of a crappy race. Ok its not the methodology in this post, I understand that with Bill's video, (Thanks for taking the time).
CaptDon100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
20 Race Cycles - For Beginners and Old Alike Because I Can Jim Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) 1 04-13-2017 03:56 PM
Met Mile & HANDICAP races For The Lead Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) 21 12-22-2013 07:12 AM
Composite Speed Rating - CSR Bill V. General Discussion 117 12-21-2013 11:39 AM
FTL - Race Conditions NeedForSpeed Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 15 06-17-2013 09:18 PM
Review of TAM 4th 12.19.12 For The Lead Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) 5 12-20-2012 10:23 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 AM.