|
Google Site Search | Get RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) Interactive Teaching & Learning - Race Conditions, Contenders, Pacelines, Advanced Concepts, Betting ... |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-24-2021, 09:54 AM | #51 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: The Villages, Fl.
Posts: 3,705
|
I'm sure it would work from the program but a more accurate approach would be to take it from result charts. Than see which of the contenders or RDSS readouts come close to the parameters from the result chart.
After the fact you have actual Match Up data to that track. Before the race a horse may appear to be 1 lg. or 2 lg. from leader and actually run say 4 because of a slow pace. Or lesser due to a fast pace. Even Jockey's don't always know how a race will unfold until after the gates open and the race has progressed some. Good horses many times just track the leader when they could be the leader. If your trying to determine the track the result charts are best and if your trying to determine the horses that can meet it or possibly run to that profile than the RDSS program is for that. In other words the best of both worlds will produce the best results. Doing it from handicapping and the program can be fraught with mistakes because its constantly changing and [B]is Pace Line dependent. Even the best of us will make a Pace Line mistake and we can only use what's there. If a horse has never ran on Turf before than that data is flawed and unpredictable. If Pace Line selection was an exact science that from the program would suffice, but it is a variable. Mitch44 Last edited by Mitch44; 08-24-2021 at 10:08 AM. |
08-24-2021, 11:17 PM | #52 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 324
|
Thanks to Bill L, Mitch44, Tim (Lt1), Rmath, and everyone else who contributed to this thread.
I can't list all the PMs, P&C threads, posts, and emails to Ted that were all really important in helping me get through this process. I had been handicapping here and there, but mostly experimenting. Not much experimenting left now or later. Time to dig in and make some serious dough. These last few days have shoved a real surge into my learning curve and into my spirit too. This is huge!!! Thanks again, Mike
__________________
just keeping my trajectory in the positive http://sartinmethodology.com/pubs/RD...d_Glossary.pdf |
08-25-2021, 10:03 AM | #53 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: The Villages, Fl.
Posts: 3,705
|
Mike I wish you great success in the future.
Keep in mind that discipline and money management are also key components to success. Only increase wagers with profits and bet within your comfort level. Mitch44 |
11-28-2022, 01:11 AM | #54 | |
Grade 2
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Downers Grove, Il
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
if he drops to half the class of his mdn win. Example if a horse wins his mdn at 40,00 if place in a 20,000 race he will do okay. now I am not toting this logic. Just heard on the street (other handicapping books). |
|
11-28-2022, 09:00 AM | #55 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Valley Stream NY
Posts: 9,186
|
All I can tell you is I've kept enough records to back up my statement. If not in the top 2 tt they usually won't win. Notice I didn't say never.
Tim
__________________
Trust but verify |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Saratoga Saturday | Latekick | Selections | 35 | 08-05-2016 02:12 PM |
Saratoga 2015 - PaceandCap Weekend ? | Ted Craven | General Discussion | 5 | 03-30-2015 08:07 AM |
Alabama Stakes 2014 Saratoga | Ted Craven | Races of Interest | 5 | 08-16-2014 02:19 PM |
** Update: Saratoga 2012 Plans | Ted Craven | 2012 | 48 | 08-17-2012 11:55 AM |
Pace and Cap / Sartin Methodology Weekend at Saratoga 2010 | Ted Craven | 2010 | 5 | 07-26-2010 11:48 AM |