Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > RDSS
Mark Forums Read
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts

RDSS Racing Decision Support System – The Modern Sartin Methodology

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-08-2009, 08:21 PM   #11
Bill V.
Grade 1
 
Bill V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad
Posts: 8,405
Thank You

I am so happy my project will be some help

I have many more to add so please keep checking

Clore You are right I see were I messed up
I will fix it as soon as I get home

GS everybody

[I]He was something to observe

Came in close, I heard a voice

Standing stretching every nerve

Had to listen had no choice

I did not believe the information

just had to trust imagination

My heart going boom boom boom

"Son," he said "Grab your things,

I've come to take you home."



Salsbury Hill
Bill V. is offline  
Old 01-08-2009, 08:35 PM   #12
Charlie D
Match Up Apprentice
 
Charlie D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,105
Good song Bill, carp video
Charlie D is offline  
Old 01-08-2009, 09:10 PM   #13
clore1030
Grade 1
 
clore1030's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,672
Gabriel's song about leaving Genesis.

"I was feeling part of the scenery
I walked right out of the machinery"
clore1030 is offline  
Old 01-09-2009, 06:51 AM   #14
stormbringer
Grade 1
 
stormbringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 181
Well done

Bill
This was very well done,Your work here is one the reason this site is so GREAT!

YOU ARE # PLEASE KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK.

STORM
stormbringer is offline  
Old 01-09-2009, 12:05 PM   #15
alydar_ David
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,654
Very nice, Bill.

:>)
alydar_ David is offline  
Old 01-09-2009, 04:50 PM   #16
Nets
Grade 2
 
Nets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Ellis Park
Posts: 98
Thanks Bill! More people appreciate what you do than you realize.
Nets is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 03:30 AM   #17
Bill V.
Grade 1
 
Bill V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad
Posts: 8,405
Audio

A very big thank you goes to Chris D. Who's donation to
Pace and cap has allowed me the ability to add audio files
into our library, Which In adddition I can add them to
the glossary of terms

Here is a example I have added this one, Listen to Doc
Corollary audio


GS
Bill

Last edited by Bill V.; 01-11-2009 at 03:34 AM.
Bill V. is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 12:43 PM   #18
Buzz
AlwNW3X
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 48
Perceptor

Hi Everyone,

I am looking for a definition of the Perceptor. Does anyone know the definition of the Perceptor and how it is computed?

Thanks,

Buzz
Buzz is offline  
Old 04-19-2009, 11:14 AM   #19
delmarscott2004
delmarscott2004
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County California
Posts: 132
Bill , thanks for the refresher , right place and time .
delmarscott2004 is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 11:54 AM   #20
Ted Craven
Grade 1
 
Ted Craven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Huntsville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 7,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzz View Post
Hi Everyone,

I am looking for a definition of the Perceptor. Does anyone know the definition of the Perceptor and how it is computed?

Thanks,

Buzz
Buzz,

Perceptor is a concept carried forward from Speculator (and from earlier software like Energy!) which shows factors in terms of their deviation from best, with best given a 0% (i.e. 0% difference - it is the best). The caption on the Primary Factors screen gives a clue:

Name:  perceptor.gif
Views: 395
Size:  22.5 KB

In this example, each of the 7 Primary factors (for the PPs of horse itself, in this case) are shown with the 0.0 (in RED) representing the best for that factor. Big Brown's 2008 Derby PP shows that his last race FX was his best FX (0.0%). His second line FX was 0.1% worse than his best.

Part of the idea for showing factors like this is to reveal just how close or how separate differently ranked numbers are. In the FX example, the 2nd line FX is ranked #2 but it is only 0.1% different from the best. That small a difference (1/10th of one percent) is insignificant, and is indistinguishable from chart-caller error. It could really be co-ranked #1. However, the 3rd line EPR is 21.5% worse than the last line EPR (the best, at 0.0%). Though this EPR is ranked #3 it is a LOT different than the #3 ranking of the FX for line 3, which is only 1.5% different from best. (In this example, we're comparing a Turf line 3 to dirt lines, so the big differences in EPR and LPR compared to the subsequent dirt lines is understandable.) Perceptor style numbers do reveal that not all ranks, which are shown on the BL/Bl screen, and go into making up the Primary Line Score and thus the BL/BL ranking - are created equal.

In many cases, the actual number values of the factors (which are shown on other screens) are irrelevant (they're a kind of magic number - we're interested in the ranks and the relative differences, or gaps more than we're interested that LPR is 92.6, for example). So Peceptor does away with the underlying values themselves, and puts all factors on a comparable scale - namely percentage difference from best - then compares the ranks (top 3 coloured) and the gaps in an impactful way.

Perhaps you wondering about Perceptor Total? Well, carrying the concept forward, it's a more fine-grained, alternate form of Line Score. The Primary Line Score is a sum of ranks of the 7 Primary Factors. But we've just finished noticing above that not all ranks are created equal. So Perceptor Total simply sums all the percentage differences - instead of summing the ranks - then ranks that sum (the sum is not shown) in terms of difference from best. Again, in the above example, we don't really care that Big Brown's last line sums to 17.4 and represents the 0.0% (the best), and that the 2nd line sums to 23.0 which is 5.6 points worse (the figure shown) than 17.4. Too much information! We simply want to know a rank, and a gap or margin. We want to know how similar or dissimilar lines are to each other, as that is how they will also differentiate themselves when compared against each other (either same horse, or different horses).

Showing the entire Primary Factor grid this way also reveals if one factor alone comprises most of the difference in the ranking for the whole line score, which is the case for the 3rd line in the above example: the EPR 21.5 if by far the biggest (i.e. worst) member in the resulting line score. If this had resulted (in a different example) in ranking a horse (or a single horse) best but was predominately due to ONE factor, we'd like to know that, in case that factor is actually a negative in today's race (e.g. stong LPR value in an Aqueduct Inner dirt sprint, or stong EPR in a Turf route (at least typically). That's the fine-grained part of Perceptor, as mentioned above.

The above example refers to Perceptor numbers as shown for a single horse, and I would recommend its use more for selecting a representative line or lines (along with Total Energy) on a horse by horse basis than for making final elimination decisions among compared horses. Eliminate to the top 5 Total Energy horses and you will almost always have the top 5 ranked Perceptor Totals as well.

Name:  perceptor2.jpg
Views: 389
Size:  48.6 KB

However, there is a bit of magic in how BL/BL tweaks the results of that Top 5, as shown very typically here when the #10 horse is elevated from 4th ranked Perceptor Total to #2 ranked BL/BL, and at 20-1 is a bet in your sleep (and a $41.00 winner )

Name:  perceptor3.jpg
Views: 398
Size:  39.1 KB

Moral: use Perceptor figures moreso to identify a line or lines to represent a horse in today's Analysis set, and less so to identify wagers - leave that final decision making to BL/BL rankings and/or energy disbursement screens like the Segments screen and the Early/Late graph (and of course the offered odds, and your knowledge of factor bias for today's track, surface and distance).

Hope that shines some light on derivation and usage or Perceptor figures.

Ted
__________________

R
DSS -
Racing Decision Support System™ Follow on Twitter @SartinMethod

Last edited by Ted Craven; 04-20-2009 at 11:57 AM.
Ted Craven is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Glossary of Terms Bill V. RDSS 5 08-13-2013 10:33 PM
Anyone With Updated DMR Par Times? lsosa54 Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 2 10-23-2008 05:45 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 PM.