Wednesday 6f "matchers" - Page 3 - Pace and Cap

Bill Lyster · 12-31-2009, 03:31 AM

Well that was fun, and profitable. Kind of a late Christmas present from the horse racing gods and their elves. Lets do it again!

Bill Lyster · 01-03-2010, 08:22 PM

Mike:

had a question about your analysis of the speed duel in the GG race 5. 2 and 8 were the speed, but 8 had a 21.1 and 44.2 pace two back. The 2 last lead a 21.8 but 2nd back wouldn't take the lead in that same fraction. It seemed to me that the 8 would be speed of the speed and not get too taxed up front. The OTE call was the right one, but I was wondering what your thought process was in the face of such fast early fractions. If you said that it was a freak time and would not repeat, thats okay, but if you were thinking that pressure would make the 8 crack more detail would be appreciated. I did not download the race to RDSS so I could not check the E/L or track adjustment figures to see if the time was just whacko or what?

Thanks,

Bill L.

mikesal57 · 01-04-2010, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lyster

Mike:

had a question about your analysis of the speed duel in the GG race 5. 2 and 8 were the speed, but 8 had a 21.1 and 44.2 pace two back. The 2 last lead a 21.8 but 2nd back wouldn't take the lead in that same fraction. It seemed to me that the 8 would be speed of the speed and not get too taxed up front. The OTE call was the right one, but I was wondering what your thought process was in the face of such fast early fractions. If you said that it was a freak time and would not repeat, thats okay, but if you were thinking that pressure would make the 8 crack more detail would be appreciated. I did not download the race to RDSS so I could not check the E/L or track adjustment figures to see if the time was just whacko or what?

Thanks,

Bill L.

Sorry i didnt get back to this Bill..and yes..I thought it was a freak race..I've read that The Hat would look at several races , not just one.

mike

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Wednesday -- August 5, 2009	alydar_ David	Selections	39	08-05-2009 05:58 PM
BEL 7th- Wednesday, June 24	alydar_ David	Selections	1	06-24-2009 04:55 PM
Wednesday -- March 4, 2009	alydar_ David	Selections	31	03-04-2009 05:08 PM
Wednesday	Tim Y	Selections	26	02-18-2009 03:41 PM
Wednesday, October 8	alydar_ David	Selections	23	10-08-2008 05:14 PM

12-31-2009, 03:31 AM	#21
Bill Lyster Grade 1 Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Escondido CA just 25 minutes from where the turf meets the surf - "...at Del Mar" Posts: 2,491	Well that was fun, and profitable. Kind of a late Christmas present from the horse racing gods and their elves. Lets do it again!

01-03-2010, 08:22 PM	#22
Bill Lyster Grade 1 Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Escondido CA just 25 minutes from where the turf meets the surf - "...at Del Mar" Posts: 2,491	Mike: had a question about your analysis of the speed duel in the GG race 5. 2 and 8 were the speed, but 8 had a 21.1 and 44.2 pace two back. The 2 last lead a 21.8 but 2nd back wouldn't take the lead in that same fraction. It seemed to me that the 8 would be speed of the speed and not get too taxed up front. The OTE call was the right one, but I was wondering what your thought process was in the face of such fast early fractions. If you said that it was a freak time and would not repeat, thats okay, but if you were thinking that pressure would make the 8 crack more detail would be appreciated. I did not download the race to RDSS so I could not check the E/L or track adjustment figures to see if the time was just whacko or what? Thanks, Bill L.