Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) > Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum
Get RDSS
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2008, 12:05 AM   #11
CEW
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 121
Biasgraph

Tim...........

You are right that the Biasgraph is the same as early/late. But it shows early/late relative to any readout(s) you like, (for me, that is FW, EP, SP), and its a little more dimensional.

Below, I'm attaching a graph from one of my better wins this year. Tampa Bay, Feb. 15, the 4th (6 Furlongs). And they were running fairly early.

Dick...or anyone else...maybe you can coach me if this attachment doesn't come up. I'm weak as hell in that department. Its in Excel. So I don't know if you can automatically open it or not.

Now, here's how you read it: across the bottom is % median. Each horse is plotted in VERTICAL fashion at his % Median point. The top connected line is early (purple), the middle is Factor W (average pace), and the bottom is Sustained (yellow). So the top purple line represents Early for all 5 contenders; the higher the dots, the faster.

The horses were entered from lowest % M (# 6) to highest (# 4). They're reflected that way from left to right. So, for instance, # 6 has his 3 dots up and down nearest the left margin, and his 3 readouts are plotted at his % M of 67.73.

The numerical readouts tell the same story as the graph, but the graph eliminates having to "rank" the contenders. One quick look and you can see 4 and 8 on the lead, with 6 and 7 looking like duds. 1 and 8 look like they have more finish to them, but when you realize what the odds were, you'll agree that 4 is part of the play.

# 4 won at 23-1, #1 was around 2-1, and 8 was around 6/5. I was lucky enough that those 2 favorites finished out of the $, which gave me a trifecta for over $ 1,800.00. I hit an $ 80 horse at CD this year with this graph too, but no trifecta !

Anyway, just like Michael Schertz (the creator of this) says, you have to have good pacelines for it to be realistic. And I guess that's any program we're using, right??


P.S. For turf races winners, the yellow (sustained) connecting line will often cross up over his FW and EP. I've seen quite a few grass races where only 1 or 2 horses will have that yellow line flipped up over their FW and EP. Those are pretty easy winners. Of course they are the top 2 Sus. numerically. But the graph makes them jump out.

Thanks....

Chuck W
Attached Files
File Type: xls TB 2-15-08 4th.xls (22.5 KB, 375 views)
CEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wagercapping - Follow Up Articles Ted Craven Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 19 03-22-2010 05:06 PM
%early Vs. %median socantra Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 13 11-10-2006 03:15 PM
Follow-Up #28 Houndog Velocity Programs 1 07-07-2006 03:29 PM
Follow-Up #29 Houndog Velocity Programs 0 07-07-2006 08:29 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 PM.