Tam 1-22 09

[Rverge]

3-7 @ tam r 2. maybe the 1 also if the 3 drops lower

[Tim Y]

hard to beat Hannah Can FLy (3) in the md race 2nd at AQU

[mikesal57]

boxing 1-3-5 ex

[Tim Y]

Originally Posted by mikesal57

what do u mean "new standards'...did i miss something?

A new track superintendent and his crew have reworked the inner as the profile is almost a Black and white negative of how it has run the last 7 years akin to the way Keeneland changed (not to the same degree but the same direction) when it was reconfigured and resurfaced.

[Rverge]

Originally Posted by Rverge

3-7 @ tam r 2. maybe the 1 also if the 3 drops lower

was look'n ok there for few but the 5 wins

[raceman5]

might as well post the rest of my p4 ticket. hit the 2nd race.

Aqu Race 3. 7-1-5
Race 4. 3-4-2
Race 5. 2-1A

Just for a dollar.

[Rverge]

tam 3 5-9. no i'm not betting the 3 'couse of it's name

[Tim Y]

and from the clouds in the AQU 3rd not too definitive a race however

[Rverge]

Originally Posted by raceman5

might as well post the rest of my p4 ticket. hit the 2nd race.

Aqu Race 3. 7-1-5
Race 4. 3-4-2
Race 5. 2-1A

Just for a dollar.

good hit for the dd

[clore1030]

Originally Posted by Tim Y

A new track superintendent and his crew have reworked the inner as the profile is almost a Black and white negative of how it has run the last 7 years akin to the way Keeneland changed (not to the same degree but the same direction) when it was reconfigured and resurfaced.

Well, lemme see if I can get in sync with the new bias. I'm going with the 2 and the 1 in the third. The 2 is admittedly closer to the pace on my readout, but it's one that bugs me enough to have to use it.