Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) > Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum
Get RDSS
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-14-2006, 11:27 AM   #1
RichieP
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,019
Variants / Interesting article

this is copied from the HTR board and references two of the best variant makers in the business. Cj and HDW.

Notice the question raised here by the poster who is EXTREMELY sharp capper in his own right.

here is the link which might make for easier reading.
http://www.homebased2.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5576

Code:
Calling HDW: A real head scratcher at PHA on 6-12 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I posted a similar note on Craig's Pacefigures.com board and I'm interested in hearing from HDW on how two respectable, accurate and credible figure-makers could come up with such a diametrically opposed view of the variants at Philly Park. 

That CJ got it right is not the point. I'm not in the finger-pointing business and I did not bet the race.
I'd just like to know how these things happen. (Tonight, HDW will get a longshot right and CJ will blow one. Besides it looked like EVERYONE had the same call on the race given the winner's $24 price)

6th race on June 12 --- long story short: Here are how the two figure makers saw the last line of Pasta and the race winner B. Murray. First fig is the pace followed by the speed figure. (not the performance figure CJ uses.) 

Pacefigures.com

Pasta May 7th 93 83
Murray May 30th 92 91

Yet HDW gives Pasta a 72 final figure to a 58 for Murray. 

Both services use the Beyer scale. 

Further according to pacefigures, Murray pressed a 105 !!! pace on 5/30 compared to a 93 for Pasta. 
HTR/HDW saw Pasta's race as a 99 PAC compared to a 95 for Murray's. 

How could the differentials be so large???

How could Pacefigures.com see Murray's race as having a 4-5 length faster pace than Pasta's while HTR saw Pasta's race as about 3-4 lengths faster at the pace call? I know it's largely a question for CJ but I would be interested in hearing what HDW or Ken thinks.

Here's the real screwy part: Murray's race went in 107.9 while Pasta's went in 110. For the same 20K claimers. 
That would lead you to conclude HDW/HTR had the variant pegged correctly -- that Murray's race had to be adjusted downward.

Yet Pacefigures was correct -- Murray's was apparently the better race and he won on 6/12 paying $24.
Pasta was 4-5 so I presume every figure-maker saw the same thing as HDW. (I didn't see the Beyers.)
__________________
huguenot

Last edited by RichieP; 06-14-2006 at 11:31 AM.
RichieP is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
interesting name tompkins Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 0 06-02-2006 03:14 PM
Interesting Balance Numbers Turbulator Speculator 3 05-05-2006 04:30 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 AM.