Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > General Discussion
Get RDSS
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-15-2013, 09:56 PM   #1
cigar
3-3-1 - 3-3-2
 
cigar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 405
Newbie needs clarification!

I am new to RDSS software and have few questions your help would be greatly appreciated.

1. In RDSS are the races divided into three equal parts (F1, F2 and F3) or if F1 = 2 furlongs, F3 = 4/6 Furlongs and F3 = 4/6 Furlongs to Finish Line?

2. I am looking for a simple explanation for Factor W or Factor Win and Factor X and how you should use these factors when evaluating contenders? Listed below is what I was able to extract from reading the Follow Up.

3. I notice when I was evaluating the races in the Demo database DC and
VDC ranking produce some nice price winners. Is my explanation below of the two correct? Do you have a simplified explanation?

4. Is Total Energy a good indicator to identify the pace of Sprint races?

5. Is CPR a good indicator to identify pace in Route races?

FW:
Factor W or Factor win (EP + SP) is the balance between Early and Late Energy-Velocity yield. Different formula for Sprint and Route is particularly effective when a horse runs a balanced race. (In RDSS, FW in sprints = (2x EPR)+LPR. In routes, FW = EPR + (2x LPR)).

FX:
FX: Factor X is the weighted composite of 1st and 3rd fraction velocity or energy expenditure. (The MPH FactorX (F1+F3) / 2 = RDSS FX = F1+F3 (same thing)). This factor is only significant in sprint races. My Opinion: it works for Sprint because it gives an indicator if the horse can carry it speed to the finish. Factor X, which is indeed the first and third fractions added together and divided by two.
DCL:
Deceleration (F3/SC) – Deceleration is simply the ratio of Fraction 3 velocity to Second Call (SC) velocity.

VDC:
(Velocity relative to Deceleration) is a fraction by fraction summing of deceleration relative to how fast the horse was going in that fraction, then ranked and merged with the Bottom Line ranking, such that you could have ties if the BL rank was lower but the V/DC rank was higher. Guy (and lots of others) were troubled that you could have ties in a factor ranking, but Doc wanted people to look at horses who did well at overcoming the pace of the race, even if they ranked lower on BL/BL which they would often do if they happened to have a lower Total Energy. If odds permit, such horses should be strongly considered for some kind of a wager.
I have seen stats from a several data keepers (Froggy comes to mind) who report that Top 2 and tie V/DC ranked horses win about 65% of the time, and Top 3 and ties 80%+. Of course, it varies by track, distance surface, etc. In my opinion, everybody should consult the V/DC rank in their analysis.
 
Thanks
cigar is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just another clarification pktruckdriver Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 8 07-28-2010 06:19 PM
3rd Hol 22May09 ..Enlighten a newbie seattlesnake RDSS 9 05-26-2009 05:12 PM
Newbie saying hello pktruckdriver General Discussion 35 05-06-2009 03:47 PM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 PM.