Betting on Longshots

Ted, an apt description of Saliu and I smiled when I read your comments. I do not subscribe to using his theory, theories for horseracing. They may work for the lottery and or casino but that is not my focus. I'm not sure but I don't think that he has academic credentials or honors that would add credibility to his work. Now I do think that his theories related to skips, frequencies, combinations, and etc. has some virtue when applied to his focus of games of chance. It may be possible to apply those approaches to Pick 6s, but I don't play them. I am not a mathematician and certainly don't claim that aptitude, but I like to keep an open mind to those ideas or approaches that may have some use to me. It seems to me that Saliu does not discount randomness but says why not look at those things which may be unique to random occurrences and use them to the players advantage. I have also found that his book is more readable (after 2 reads) than material that he posts on his site. I have not done any testing of his theories and don't intend to do so. I just like his ideas and maybe if I ever play Pick 6s I will do a little testing and of course I would never ignore the genius of Sartin and Bradshaw.
Pat