|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read
| General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-27-2007, 12:53 PM
|
#1 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,258
|
Keeneland to Churchill
Just thinking out loud for a moment. Does anyone think it would be valid to look at horses that were ESF (early speed failures) at Keeneland if they ship to Churchill.
I am not really talking about habitual quitters, but horses that hung tough until stretch and caught in the later stages of the race while setting honest fractions. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Churchill races 3-8-10 | RAMON201 | Velocity Programs | 9 | 10-29-2006 10:31 AM |
| Churchill 6f not 6f | RAMON201 | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 6 | 10-19-2006 12:16 PM |
| churchill with validator | Forego | Selections | 12 | 06-27-2006 07:10 PM |
| Churchill Downs Race 10 | Houndog | Selections | 10 | 06-04-2006 10:09 AM |
| Churchill Downs results | Houndog | General Discussion | 0 | 05-01-2006 09:00 PM |
|
Threaded Mode