Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) > Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum
Get RDSS
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2007, 01:12 PM   #1
tompkins
Grade 1
 
tompkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 708
BAD races

One of the skills it takes A LONG TIME to acquire, is knowing when to watch a race and just leave it alone. Don't say that I am anywhere close to perfect in that regard but am making strides. The 2nd race at Philly is a good example of one: JUST ABOUT ALL the theoretical "contenders" were ranked on lines that were sample errors: NO OTHER LINES substantiated what one found in the initial one. Second, many of those same contenders had regressed as the lines that MADE them contenders were the 2nd and third lines back. Without troubled trips, these horses faced the same or slower fractions and did not contend. It wasn't Denmark but something smelled rotten.

Question is then, how many of these can one overlook, and which of the others can step up. It is simply too confusing to waste time with as there are many other logical ones on the card.
__________________
velocititian
tompkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:45 AM.