Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > RDSS
Get RDSSMark Forums Read
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts

RDSS Racing Decision Support System – The Modern Sartin Methodology

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-13-2007, 05:18 PM   #1
RichieP
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,019
Turfway "Live" Wednesday - Race 8

Let's do a Polyrace since it IS the wave of the future.

Here is race 8 on tomorrow nights card to be run at 6.5f.

One thing that I do in my work on this poly stuff is to only work races where ALL my fast contenders have lines from the poly surface. I do NOT mix and match. My quirky way.

Let's do the race from a matchup/ first call perspective ok? We have a nice clear early as you will see to get a projected FIRST CALL pace from.

Then we will:
1) select contenders who have shown an ability to run against the FIRST CALL proj pace

2) after selecting suitable horses and some lines we will chop out some horses to reduce the mix.

3) will post up the various screens on RDSS

4) see what shakes out come race time


first here are the tandems for the race. I LOVE this screen.
Attached Images
 
__________________
"Grampy I'm talking to you!"
RichieP is offline  
Old 03-13-2007, 05:29 PM   #2
RichieP
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,019
let's start with the projected pacesetter.

This is the #6 horse who kind of looks like a "stop on his own" type runner. We will use his 2nd race back to project 1st and 2nd call BUT keep 1thing in mind

1) Because he might be a stop on his own type we will also consider tandem horses from the last race also that was at 6f.

we will use his 22.4 - 45.7 to get us started but also consider the last race
22.7 FIRST call.

we will NOT select any horse as a contender who can NOT race against a sub 23 first call

screenshot of the 6 horse. line 2 is the POWER LINE
Attached Images
 
__________________
"Grampy I'm talking to you!"
RichieP is offline  
Old 03-13-2007, 05:33 PM   #3
RichieP
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,019
here is horse 1. how nice. his power line is also against todays pace at todays distance. he ran 2nd so we know he CAN run against these.

CONTENDER

line 3 is the line we will use and is also his POWER LINE
Attached Images
 
__________________
"Grampy I'm talking to you!"
RichieP is offline  
Old 03-13-2007, 05:36 PM   #4
RichieP
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,019
horse 2 has never faced a sub 23 first call. can he handle it? Darn if I know and until he shows it he is OUT

No line

NON CONTENDER
Attached Images
 
__________________
"Grampy I'm talking to you!"
RichieP is offline  
Old 03-13-2007, 05:41 PM   #5
RichieP
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,019
horse 3.

shows no 6.5f races but shows a tandem from the last race that our pacesetter #6 comes out of.

this guy finished 2nd running other than early and 3 back shows an aggresive
"fighting" win running early.

I mark this guy with an "unknown" style but KNOW he belongs

Line 3 is the POWER LINE

CONTENDER
Attached Images
 
__________________
"Grampy I'm talking to you!"
RichieP is offline  
Old 03-13-2007, 05:43 PM   #6
RichieP
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,019
horse 4.

sorry no poly lines and his last 7 races has NOT faced a sub 23 1st call. He can win just not for me

no line

NON CONTENDER
Attached Images
 
__________________
"Grampy I'm talking to you!"
RichieP is offline  
Old 03-13-2007, 08:19 PM   #7
froggy
Grade 1
 
froggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bullhead City Az
Posts: 921
Richie,

I read your analysis of Turfway 0304 race 8 with great interest.
With SPEC160 using the same lines you used I came up with 1-6-3-5 with the 1 and the 6 having a balance of 4.
My question is:
Do you find it effective to go back 90 or more days with animals as cheap as these?

Froggy
froggy is offline  
Old 03-14-2007, 07:19 AM   #8
RichieP
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by froggy View Post
Richie,

I read your analysis of Turfway 0304 race 8 with great interest.
With SPEC160 using the same lines you used I came up with 1-6-3-5 with the 1 and the 6 having a balance of 4.
My question is:
Do you find it effective to go back 90 or more days with animals as cheap as these?

Froggy
Hi Froggy,
I don't pay attention to days back. I am sure by doing this it burns me at times.

Hey if you do not mind a little feedback on the "balance" readout. When you get down to FIVE contenders be VERY wary of any horse with a balance of 9 or higher. Something is NOT right with the horse compared to todays computerized matchup.

While everyone selects contenders/lines differently this balance of 9 or higher when reducing contenders to FIVE was a "trigger" to throw the horse out for WIN consideration.

This remained CONSISTENTLY true for over EIGHT years of working the software.

stay cool
Richie
__________________
"Grampy I'm talking to you!"
RichieP is offline  
Old 03-14-2007, 10:08 AM   #9
Bill Lyster
Grade 1
 
Bill Lyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Escondido CA just 25 minutes from where the turf meets the surf - "...at Del Mar"
Posts: 2,491
Raw Matchup vs adjusted data screen question

Richie:

How do you use or integrate the observations and data from the Raw Matchup information when the data gets adjusted? Do you go through the Matchup process with adjusted data? Are you looking for verification of the raw matchup info? And what do you do in either case? If adjusted matches raw and if adjusted leans toward a horse other than the raw matchup.

Thanks,
Bill
Bill Lyster is offline  
Old 03-14-2007, 10:17 AM   #10
RichieP
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Lyster View Post
Richie:

How do you use or integrate the observations and data from the Raw Matchup information when the data gets adjusted? Do you go through the Matchup process with adjusted data? Are you looking for verification of the raw matchup info? And what do you do in either case? If adjusted matches raw and if adjusted leans toward a horse other than the raw matchup.

Thanks,
Bill
Bill
I use only raw unadjusted data when I work and BET races.

The other screens I put up to let folks see the adjusted stuff. After all to be HONEST there is almost nobody working races totally depending on raw pacelines.

For myself when I work a race ONLY the raw screen showing the pacelines is looked at. There also will be 2-6 lines entered for some individual horses I feel are the TRUE win contenders in an attempt to see a 'picture" of the horse combining pacelines.

It is ALL good Bill. Many ways to make a buck in this game man

Richie
__________________
"Grampy I'm talking to you!"
RichieP is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sunland "Live" Tuesday - RDSS RichieP RDSS 32 02-26-2007 08:39 PM
Tampa Tuesday "Live" - Round 3 RichieP RDSS 47 02-07-2007 06:31 PM
Tampa Tuesday "Live" - Round 2 RichieP RDSS 37 01-31-2007 06:08 PM
NTRA - Mandatory Fg Race Friday - "Live" RichieP RDSS 14 01-26-2007 07:19 PM
Gulfstream "Live" Wednesday - Race 2 RichieP RDSS 25 01-25-2007 08:52 PM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 AM.