screenshots for Gpx 10th race - Pace and Cap

Bob Cochran · 02-18-2007, 04:21 PM

These are the horses selected from the non-contenders thread as the
true contenders after eliminations.

2-3-5-7-9-10 ae they appear in spec 160 and the workhorse "fair odds"

let's see what goes down.

Bob Cochran · 02-18-2007, 04:23 PM

The remaining screenshot of GPX 10th race

shrink1 · 02-18-2007, 09:14 PM

Bob,
I use Workhorse, but do not have Speculator. My read out for Workhorse was
10 7 8 Did you just eliminate the 8 and not use it. The percentages were
9 5 3 53% in the win column and a positive roi, and 60% in the show
2 column with a positive roi. Why did you leave the 3 out of your Spec readout? any help you can give me to refine my handicapping with workhorse will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you

Bob Cochran · 02-18-2007, 10:17 PM

Hi Shrink.
If you will go to the non-contenders thread, you will see how i broke the race down before putting the horses into the software. After elimination
of non-contenders, 2,3,5,7,9,and 10 were the remaining horses.

Evidently, the line i used for # 3 did'nt give it winning numbers as far as
i was concerned. I did remark about the race on the non-contender thread.

check it out

Bob Cochran · 02-18-2007, 10:21 PM

BTW, i do not keep a database with Workhorse. I use it for contenders only

shrink1 · 02-19-2007, 10:07 AM

Bob,
Thanks for your help. When you select your contenders do you just take the top5 or 6 Podds horses and go from there?? Do you also run them through speculator, and do the match up?
Thanks again for your help.
Shrink

Bob Cochran · 02-19-2007, 10:33 AM

It depends on the size of the field. If there are 7 or less horses in the race i will use the "fair odds" horses in PODDS (all 10-1 or less) for the match up and computer input. I only used Spec for the non-contender example.

If you noticed, there were 12 horses in the example race. I don't enter large
fields into my software because of the confusion it creates. I attempt to
trim the field as much as possible, then use the computer.

shrink1 · 02-19-2007, 08:28 PM

Bob,
I want to thank you very much for your replies and help. Although, I have used Workhorse for a long time you have given me more insight int using it further. This board has also helped me with my handicapping.
Thanks to all
Shrink1

02-18-2007, 04:21 PM	#1
Bob Cochran Grade 1 Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 329	screenshots for Gpx 10th race These are the horses selected from the non-contenders thread as the true contenders after eliminations. 2-3-5-7-9-10 ae they appear in spec 160 and the workhorse "fair odds" let's see what goes down. Attached Images

02-18-2007, 04:23 PM	#2
Bob Cochran Grade 1 Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 329	spec 160 view The remaining screenshot of GPX 10th race Attached Images

02-18-2007, 09:14 PM	#3
shrink1 Grade 1 Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Newton, N.J. Posts: 121	GP Race 2/18 Bob, I use Workhorse, but do not have Speculator. My read out for Workhorse was 10 7 8 Did you just eliminate the 8 and not use it. The percentages were 9 5 3 53% in the win column and a positive roi, and 60% in the show 2 column with a positive roi. Why did you leave the 3 out of your Spec readout? any help you can give me to refine my handicapping with workhorse will be greatly appreciated. Thank you

02-18-2007, 10:17 PM	#4
Bob Cochran Grade 1 Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 329	shrink1 Hi Shrink. If you will go to the non-contenders thread, you will see how i broke the race down before putting the horses into the software. After elimination of non-contenders, 2,3,5,7,9,and 10 were the remaining horses. Evidently, the line i used for # 3 did'nt give it winning numbers as far as i was concerned. I did remark about the race on the non-contender thread. check it out Last edited by Bob Cochran; 02-18-2007 at 10:18 PM. Reason: clarity

02-18-2007, 10:21 PM	#5
Bob Cochran Grade 1 Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 329	shrink1 BTW, i do not keep a database with Workhorse. I use it for contenders only

02-19-2007, 10:07 AM	#6
shrink1 Grade 1 Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Newton, N.J. Posts: 121	GP race 10 Bob, Thanks for your help. When you select your contenders do you just take the top5 or 6 Podds horses and go from there?? Do you also run them through speculator, and do the match up? Thanks again for your help. Shrink

02-19-2007, 10:33 AM	#7
Bob Cochran Grade 1 Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 329	shrink1 It depends on the size of the field. If there are 7 or less horses in the race i will use the "fair odds" horses in PODDS (all 10-1 or less) for the match up and computer input. I only used Spec for the non-contender example. If you noticed, there were 12 horses in the example race. I don't enter large fields into my software because of the confusion it creates. I attempt to trim the field as much as possible, then use the computer.

02-19-2007, 08:28 PM	#8
shrink1 Grade 1 Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Newton, N.J. Posts: 121	GP race Bob, I want to thank you very much for your replies and help. Although, I have used Workhorse for a long time you have given me more insight int using it further. This board has also helped me with my handicapping. Thanks to all Shrink1

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Ct 10th	shoeless	Selections	1	04-21-2006 11:06 PM
EVD 10th -- Wednesday, Jan. 25	alydar_ David	Selections	8	01-26-2006 04:31 PM
EVD 10th -- Friday, Jan. 20	alydar_ David	Selections	9	01-21-2006 12:48 AM
Saturday Tampa 10th-Different Approach	shoeless	Selections	26	01-14-2006 05:13 PM