[Bill V.]

Hello Mark

Excuse me but I have edited your post

First how this man works races are not by class only. The guidelines analyze equal
parts of Recency (form) Class, Ability = Up close positions, Particularly the break and 1st fraction and Consistency
His guidelines eliminate noncontenders and noise

Second. As far as what I did or as you say "missed"
Perhaps you did not read the whole thread. I never worked this race.
First and foremost I asked the group for their opinions on one horse
Horse # 1. Why? because it was a race I happen to be looking at.
I saw a pattern that I come across often, The question involved was,
Should the last line be excused?
You choose to wait until I posted the PP's and result chart as it looks like you assumed I lost this race, because of my flawed handicapping.and or Sartin methodology method. Phase 1.

You never mention that my lines and RDSS get the very chalky winner
rated right on top, The horse I posted placed, losing by 1 length Using line 2 thanks to the response given to me in this post.

I never posted this example as a racing demo, I never asked, a post-mortem
why I could have lost this race.
It was requested that I post the entries, conditions and full PP's in a private message. This I did and was thanked privately.
The PM was from a participant. And I did not feel anybody needed to download a whole card that had already been run just to help me analyze
one particular horse and a pattern, in regards to excusing the last line.

The posts and thread were submitted as a learning example and I feel it served the group well.

Friends helping friends win

Thanks, Mark for your view on the paceline
I appreciate that.

Bill