View Single Post
Old 11-01-2021, 06:20 PM   #88
Ted Craven
Grade 1
 
Ted Craven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 8,855
I was probably not too clear, sorry! For geeks and formula wranglers -


CSR:
For 4+ races, we use 100% of line 1 SR + 62% of (line1+line2)/2 + 38% of (line1+line2+line3)/3 + 24% of (line1+line2+line3+line4)/4

For 3 races, we use 100% of line 1 SR + 62% of (line1+line2)/2 + 38% of (line1+line2+line3)/3 + 24% of (line1+line2+line3)/3

For 2 races, we use 100% of line 1 SR + 62% of (line1+line2)/2 + 38% of (line1+line2)/2 + 24% of (line1+line2)/2

For 1 race, we use 100% of line 1 SR + 62% of line1 + 38% of line1 + 24% of line1

100-62-38-24% is a Fibonacci progression (an organization of natural and mathematical phenomena). Works for me ...

It's a smoothing and averaging of recent lines which conceptually depends on how useful the Adjusted Speed Rating concept itself is - i.e. the distance equalization adjustments, the daily-track and inter-track adjustments and the surface to surface adjustments turf/dirt/poly (which is really just another track to track adjustment).

Of course no set of adjustments is perfect, hence the minimal ability to exclude one low rating (especially in Top 2) which disproportionately affects CSR. But this concoction seems to have pretty good legs, especially when married with other ratings, and especially with other non-correlated ratings (e.g. an oddsline built of not only speed/pace/deceleration factors, but also positional pace, class, public ratings like Prime Power/Profit Line/Morning Line -- and public tote odds --> hence Rx).

Hope that helps.

Ted
__________________

R
DSS -
Racing Decision Support System™

Last edited by Ted Craven; 11-01-2021 at 07:55 PM. Reason: clarify re excluding 1 low rating & 'non-correlated' importance
Ted Craven is offline   Reply With Quote