Quote:
Originally Posted by shoeless
I would vote no then as the best way according to Purdy to use the setup times in Synergism is by the majority of the distances you are using in the pp's.
Also would like to comment on Mildeu posts using Synergism,for me the reason I like it is the simplicity of having only 3 screens.
1st screen- all the factors readouts
2nd screen and in my opinion the most important dream race and SCBL
3rd screen-rankings
There is more then enough info here to get you by.
Jeff
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff, the paceline selection would be done through RDSS. You would have the option to equalize (adjust) by distances and /or surfaces or you could use the raw data.
The pars would be governed by RDSS and there would be no need for yearly updating of pars.
In a sense Synergism would provide the readouts that would be reliant on the data provided by RDSS The process would be easy to do and as far as I'm concerned, and very efficient.
To my mind Synergisms strength are it's readouts which makes a final decision for a single horse easier for me.