Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post

Jeebs · 04-05-2017, 01:16 AM

Aren't these basically measuring the same thing? Granted, TPR uses the 2nd call and final fraction translated to a 100 point scale, while TE uses the sum of the three velocity fractions (1F+2F+3F).

I had been mixing TE analysis with TPR analysis, using the TPR screen as a way to weed out contenders. However, if TE is basically measuring the same thing as TPR, wouldn't the TPR screen basically be redundant? In other words, why confuse the situation if a certain set of numbers works for you?

I'm debating ignoring TPR completely and instead, simply using TE and the fractional velocities as a means of measurement.

Thoughts?

04-05-2017, 01:16 AM	#1
Jeebs Grade 1 Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 909	Total Energy vs. TPR Aren't these basically measuring the same thing? Granted, TPR uses the 2nd call and final fraction translated to a 100 point scale, while TE uses the sum of the three velocity fractions (1F+2F+3F). I had been mixing TE analysis with TPR analysis, using the TPR screen as a way to weed out contenders. However, if TE is basically measuring the same thing as TPR, wouldn't the TPR screen basically be redundant? In other words, why confuse the situation if a certain set of numbers works for you? I'm debating ignoring TPR completely and instead, simply using TE and the fractional velocities as a means of measurement. Thoughts?