Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post - Rmath's 4-factor Method

rmath · 08-04-2020, 09:48 PM

Ted, in race 7 you asked why the 4 & 10 were ranked as Cs. the answer is they were both primary win contenders because they both had a 3 in the rankings and they had at least 3 of the 4 rankings. Also if someone was using the A,B, C
horses in a p-3 4 5 or 6 they might not use both horses on a ticket , which in a lot of cases would end up with a loosing play instead of a winning one.

I have found that horses with 3 or 4 ratings and at least one is a 3 or lower in any of the ratings should be used in the p-5 & p-6, if the cost is not too high.

About 50% of all the p-6 at GP are made up of these horses.
Richard

08-04-2020, 09:48 PM	#18
rmath Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 1,676	7-31 r7 Ted, in race 7 you asked why the 4 & 10 were ranked as Cs. the answer is they were both primary win contenders because they both had a 3 in the rankings and they had at least 3 of the 4 rankings. Also if someone was using the A,B, C horses in a p-3 4 5 or 6 they might not use both horses on a ticket , which in a lot of cases would end up with a loosing play instead of a winning one. I have found that horses with 3 or 4 ratings and at least one is a 3 or lower in any of the ratings should be used in the p-5 & p-6, if the cost is not too high. About 50% of all the p-6 at GP are made up of these horses. Richard