Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill V.
I disagree
There is no Modern Sartin Methodology or else censorship
on Pace and Cap
This issue comes up every now and then I keep asking the same
question to this accusation
If somebody post a race with Phase 1, Kgen, Energy, Speculator,
Validator PL4 or any Sartin Program or just does races with the Match Up
I will read that post and do the race myself with the same program
So what is the problem ?
Almost all of the lessons that FTL post in the teaching area are
handicapping lessons and paceline and contender selection lessons
Modern or traditional Sartin methodology, ether way you had better make correct pace line and contender selections.
anyway thank you for your opinion
and good skill
Bill
|
I agree with Bill V.
What everyone should know, what everyone should understand, is this.
Although this site is about the “Modern Sartin Methodology”, I do not adhere to that philosophy. I am “old school” Sartin Methodology in my concepts of line selection and contender selection. In fact, I even add to those old school principles, some facts I have developed on my own through the use of a very sizeable database I have been keeping for moré than 15 years. And, I am not a two horse bettor. I could go on and on with how my concepts differ from the modern methodology and that is reflected in my many posts in the teaching area. Moreover, in my daily play, I use my own software program, not RDSS.
I spent several years writing my thoughts. I even posted races using the old ENERGY program. I started posting up snippets of various items from the OLD follow ups and the paceline manual.
Being fully aware of the foregoing, Ted developed a working relationship with me, whereby I would have access to RDSS so that I could post example races and etc., in a format that would be more helpful to those using RDSS. Therefore, I must say that Ted exercises great flexibility with what gets posted on this site.
Surely, if Ted’s “mo” was his way or the highway, I would have been far down the road long ago.