Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill V.
Wow we get to post all kinds of programs
|
Double Wow!!!!!!!
Great comment ,Bill....Lmao......
This is the kind of thread that I enjoy reading...
I will not get into which program does what or is most efficient, rather I will focus on the adjusted speed ratings of......of any numbers....those on Rdss, Thorograph,Beyers, or energy...
What am I referring to...any number rating system that rates the top finishers in numerical order are flawed....imho....
Example....one horse sets a blistering early pace fractions and hits the finish line at the same time as a deep closer who sits far off the fast early pace and arrives at the finish line together with the early pace setter are NOT EQUAL IN ABILITY.....any number ratings system which gives equal weight in numbers or speed ratings are flawed...Yes, these two hit the sure at the same moment for the final time of race....
One expended the most energy or has the most ability....in future rematches..95% of the time this horse has the most ability to dictate or control the early pace to his advantage...there are too many horses that can run 109 for six furlongs for a mile and eighth race and finish under 1:49.....a accurate speed rating system would rate each horse independently based on each horse energy expenditures...
So what the hell am I talking about...We can have the most accurate speed ratings available to us and still We will not solve the riddle...the answers are in the hidden fractions, late sustained energy and early pace expenditures, and not in the final time...
Just my humble opinions...