Quote:
Originally Posted by tfm
Going to miss WO.
Final numbers for the meet:
ROI +18%
Total number of plays 345. This is deceiving however as almost 300 of these were exotic plays (exactas, mostly, with a few doubles and tris). As I typically play 2 number exactas, splitting my usual unit in half, these in fact were closer to 600 (exotic) plays; and about 65 win bets. The low number of wins bets in because I've basically stopped betting to win (for the most part).
These figures aren't that surprising, as WO has the most accurate data out there and offers just about the best racing anywhere. Then again, given the high number of mess up (poorly structured/thought out plays, the many cases where my numbers came in reversed, the number of winners I passed on, etc.) and a ridiculously poor start (something like 1 for my first 50 or so) to the meet, the results are very encouraging.
|
I confirm that WO has an excellent record, i.e., the ROI of 161 % over 71 races in 2009 according to my "theoretical" analysis. You mention that WO has the most accurate data out there. Can you think of any other tracks with slightly less accurate data? I am trying to expand my horizon beyond WO, but I see only lousy data at many other tracks...