Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post - Data Base

Tim Y · 11-07-2008, 03:40 PM

No simply asking will do. I am ready to come back to your country at first asking as I really enjoyed hanging out at Ladbroke's and watched the Grand National there as my choice ran 4th....fairly good in a field of that size and danger.

Compounding NATIONAL data like Jcaper does, makes the specifics of a distance and course like Woodbine's 7 furlong unique energy distribution, DILUTED in the evaluation. There is enough specificity at differing race tracks DAY IN AND DAY OUT to trump the averaged out malarkey of database analysis. Following the daily trends in e/l numbers taught me that a long time ago.

It is backing CHANGE, not sameness, that wins the money

11-07-2008, 03:40 PM	#27
Tim Y turf historian Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 6,455	No simply asking will do. I am ready to come back to your country at first asking as I really enjoyed hanging out at Ladbroke's and watched the Grand National there as my choice ran 4th....fairly good in a field of that size and danger. Compounding NATIONAL data like Jcaper does, makes the specifics of a distance and course like Woodbine's 7 furlong unique energy distribution, DILUTED in the evaluation. There is enough specificity at differing race tracks DAY IN AND DAY OUT to trump the averaged out malarkey of database analysis. Following the daily trends in e/l numbers taught me that a long time ago. It is backing CHANGE, not sameness, that wins the money Last edited by Tim Y; 11-07-2008 at 03:46 PM.