[VoodooFan]

Doc did'nt totally agree with the every ounce of the teaching members norms and ways, yet the majority of what they had was proven quite useful.

THE HAT stop using software, should Doc have chided him for doing so, calling his self a methodologist?

Brohamer keeps mentioning trainers ,jockeys and barns, should Doc disallow his statements since the Methodology does not use this?

There are many others, but since what Doc did use some of these teaching members and others strong points, that were put to the test, documented and proven to work over and over, winning more money, in conjunction with the established method was so powerful, which enhanced the base method expotentially, points of disagreement was not much of a factor.

I think this goes back to the fact of what this forum is about, since we had this before.

This forum is about Everything Sartin, and additional tools to enhance and captialize on the basic Sartin premise.

That other forum, is open to everything and method known to man, and a nice place to explore and discuss for something different. It has politics, commodity talks, gas prices, jokes, people in the news, etc., whatever you are in the mood for or have a flavor for, I find it quite entertaining and useful.

And yep, Pizzolla did come up with that term "Fulcrum"...check the quote below to see what THE HAT, thinks about it....THE HAT, who some famous author or known teaching member seen with his own eyes win 17 races in a row.

Doc always tried to put as much of THE HAT in the programs as humanly possibly.

This Forum is about the Sartin Methodology, All things Sartin, to understand it, win with it, and expand it still keeping Sartin at the core, more tickets cashed.

VoodooFan