Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie D
Doc wouldn't be happy about someone writing this Tim would he???
|
What Howard or ANYONE else would say about an independent interpretation of the use of the methodology means ZIP to me. Once an idea leave one's mind and moves to another, it is subject to new scrutiny with objective eyes. If subsequent evaluations don't see the same things, that's just the way it is, period.
There is NO ONE WAY to look at a bar of soap, a photograph or the methodology. If people don't press the boundaries and look for new things, it becomes MORE dogmatic, influenced more and more, by what the authors of the
Banana Republicans call "incestuous amplification." First used in the military terms, when one surrounds oneself with only those in lock step agreement with a point of view, those ideas become so intensely molded into to a strict DOGMATIC position, that objectivity goes out the window and alternatives never reach a threshold of evaluation, closed off before even being evaluated.