[VoodooFan]

Rich, I betcha the races you lost and show Mr. Bradshaw, some are, as you
call'em, "stupid mistakes" and he shows why you should've won....

Some maybe more ADVANCED applications of the spot plays and premises
he already showed and can "sometimes" point out some things....

BUT..., theres some of those races that he can't explain, put into words,
or form a specific and consistant Modus Operendi of how to win these
type races or even if that race "fit's" a catagory that consistantly
comes up from time to time......

I would hazzard to guess the races , you lost, half the time, he would
have won 1 to 2 out of the 3 you lost, but could pose no consistantly
usable explanation , am I right?

Because in some of his race examples, how do explain as a method :

A foreign horse who has no lines, but has "comment" in several lines that
he "LED" and there is no other Early horse in the race...

In the Sartin Methodology Today workbooks, he "created a virtual line"
from a foreign horse with only "ONE" fraction.....

Eliminated a horse because 99% of the time, this jockey ALWAYS forces a
horse to the LEAD , despite his running style...

And it goes on and on, just to say this.....

He MAY be able to explain this, as he explained concepts to you to present
in the 8 month update, and 1 year update.....

But at a later future date when it becomes a quantifiable
pattern that can be nailed down & consistantly percieved and
mathematically explained ,so as a MatchUp tool and operation can be
formed /fleshed out from such instinctual perceptions from a game
with both finite and infinite combinations a variables.....

Horses are living , breathing animals, not subjegated to confirm to
any mathematics known and unknown ,because life is ever
evolving and changing.

VoodooFan