Quote:
Originally Posted by socantra
It has nothing to do with any oracle or guru. It has everything to do with listening to the man who knew the algorithms in the programs and the adjustments that the programs made. You seem to have a problem with any sort of deference to Doc Sartin on these matters. I don't worship the Doc, but if I want to know how something works I will give some credence to the man who created it. That doesn't mean his word is law, but it is usually worth a listen.
|
I pay homage to Drs. Banting and Best too for discovering insulin but just like in the evolution in the treatment of diabetes, the implementation of these programs is based upon ONGOING tests and cannot rest on initial laurels alone. Things advance, they are not static. Major advances in any field of endeavor happen, oft times from sources that are not drowning in dogma but rather responding to a challenge of the rule set forth as unchallengable.
The 7.5 beaten lengths rule does not hold up to testing amongst many others that are considered dogma. The program is a tool and there is no one way to use it: never was.