[cratman]

Originally Posted by atlasaxis

Mitch,

Honestly, this may have been one of the most educational posts in the entire discussion.

Truthfully, I would rather see a losing day with the wagers, thought process, adjustments, and follow-up explanation than a winning ticket posted afterward with no explanation of how it got there.

What you showed here was real-time thinking:
class evaluation, workout patterns, exacta structure, doubles, odds sensitivity, and then afterward explaining why the approach failed and how odds changed the equation.

That’s real gambling discussion.

In many ways, when you win you learn very little because you got paid for what you already thought you knew. It’s when you lose and then honestly analyze the race, the wager, the assumptions, and the adjustments that real learning takes place.

To me, that teaches far more than simply posting a score after the fact because people can actually follow the decision-making process from beginning to end.

Win or lose, that kind of transparency and accountability has real value and is appreciated.

Tom

Agree that the specifics of the decision-making of a player with a long-time record of success is very valuable. Thanks Mitch