Quote:
Originally Posted by The Pook
“Due to the lack of interest[1 view all day] this will be the last time I will be posting selections.”
That was Tims post, not mine. I made some suggestions that I think might help. But the response from Yoda and Luke is to keep doing the exact same thing. You will then get the same level of tepid interest. Don’t matter to me. I’m not the one doing all the recording, compiling and posting.
As you were,
Pook
|
Pook, you are getting at something important here.
Listing 4, 5, or 6 horses in a race and then showing a winning result afterward doesn’t really demonstrate a wagering decision. It shows contenders, but not what was actually played.
The part that would really help people learn is simple:
What was the actual wager before the race?
Which horse or combination was the play?
How was the ticket structured?
That’s where handicapping becomes real.
Posting selections after the race and pointing to the winner doesn’t show that part of the process. Posting even just one top play or actual ticket before post time, win or lose, would make it much clearer how the method performs.
That’s the difference between reviewing a race and actually handicapping one.