Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post

Bill Lyster · 02-12-2007, 11:08 AM

Jim:

Question regarding track to track adjustments. See table page 122 and text page 123.

Repeating what I understand: low number = faster track.

Turfway = 2; churchill = 6, meaning that Turfway is 4/5ths quicker than CD.

The last paragraph on pg 123 says TP is 2/5ths slower than CD. Does this mean that TP is really an 8? Can you resolve this apparent conflict?

[I may have several other possible track to track related questions that await this clarification]

2nd question concerning the construction of the chart: On pg 121 you stated that you used the time of 107 to arrive at the equalization number for each track. Does this mean that chart is based on 6f times, or? I understand this 2nd question could have a lengthy answer, but if the chart needs updating, I'd volunteer as long as I can understand your methodology.

Thanks,

Bill

02-12-2007, 11:08 AM	#8
Bill Lyster Grade 1 Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Escondido CA just 25 minutes from where the turf meets the surf - "...at Del Mar" Posts: 2,499	Jim: Question regarding track to track adjustments. See table page 122 and text page 123. Repeating what I understand: low number = faster track. Turfway = 2; churchill = 6, meaning that Turfway is 4/5ths quicker than CD. The last paragraph on pg 123 says TP is 2/5ths slower than CD. Does this mean that TP is really an 8? Can you resolve this apparent conflict? [I may have several other possible track to track related questions that await this clarification] 2nd question concerning the construction of the chart: On pg 121 you stated that you used the time of 107 to arrive at the equalization number for each track. Does this mean that chart is based on 6f times, or? I understand this 2nd question could have a lengthy answer, but if the chart needs updating, I'd volunteer as long as I can understand your methodology. Thanks, Bill