Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post

Ted Craven · 02-01-2007, 12:11 PM

Bill, your post with ValM made me feel OK to post showing RDSS. (Forego, I hope this is OK - it's your Energy topic...)

My Match Up analysis made 12 and 4 the Earlies, but 12 appears to blow away the 4. The 7 seems like a counter-energy candidate, while the 10's Sustained running style and top Energy would seem to put it right there if the 12 works too hard on the lead or needs a race after the layoff.

Actually, I'd appreciate any insight from anyone as to why the 4 might be a survivor as an Early (or if indeed he should be expected to run as such, i.e. off his last route line).

Without regards to odds offered, I'd go with 12 and 10 as win contenders and 7 to place.

Ted

02-01-2007, 12:11 PM	#6
Ted Craven Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada Posts: 9,256	Bill, your post with ValM made me feel OK to post showing RDSS. (Forego, I hope this is OK - it's your Energy topic...) My Match Up analysis made 12 and 4 the Earlies, but 12 appears to blow away the 4. The 7 seems like a counter-energy candidate, while the 10's Sustained running style and top Energy would seem to put it right there if the 12 works too hard on the lead or needs a race after the layoff. Actually, I'd appreciate any insight from anyone as to why the 4 might be a survivor as an Early (or if indeed he should be expected to run as such, i.e. off his last route line). Without regards to odds offered, I'd go with 12 and 10 as win contenders and 7 to place. Ted Attached Images __________________ RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™ Last edited by Ted Craven; 02-01-2007 at 12:27 PM.