View Single Post
Old 08-24-2021, 09:54 AM   #51
Mitch44
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: The Villages, Fl.
Posts: 3,706
I'm sure it would work from the program but a more accurate approach would be to take it from result charts. Than see which of the contenders or RDSS readouts come close to the parameters from the result chart.

After the fact you have actual Match Up data to that track. Before the race a horse may appear to be 1 lg. or 2 lg. from leader and actually run say 4 because of a slow pace. Or lesser due to a fast pace. Even Jockey's don't always know how a race will unfold until after the gates open and the race has progressed some.

Good horses many times just track the leader when they could be the leader. If your trying to determine the track the result charts are best and if your trying to determine the horses that can meet it or possibly run to that profile than the RDSS program is for that.

In other words the best of both worlds will produce the best results. Doing it from handicapping and the program can be fraught with mistakes because its constantly changing and [B]is Pace Line dependent. Even the best of us will make a Pace Line mistake and we can only use what's there. If a horse has never ran on Turf before than that data is flawed and unpredictable. If Pace Line selection was an exact science that from the program would suffice, but it is a variable.

Mitch44

Last edited by Mitch44; 08-24-2021 at 10:08 AM.
Mitch44 is offline   Reply With Quote