|
Sartin theory and recommendation was to bet any horse going off over a certain odds in the programs top 3 and also bet good price horses to place as you accomplished.
Some just can't pull the trigger on longshots, a real hole in their game.
He also believed in two horse betting as the lower priced horses kept the bankroll healthy until the good paying horse came along and than it was all profit. Betting only one horse increases loses and when that good paying horses does come along most of the profit has to be used to recoup loses rather than profit.
Two horse betting also reduces the number of loses and it helps one to make better choices because their not under pressure from a depleted bankroll. Much better decision making is enhanced by two horse betting. Far too many look at one horse betting as macho thing instead of which makes the most money. In other words its not the road you take but whether or not you get there.
Anyone using a one horse betting procedure will incur more loses, also playing only good paying horses will incur longer runouts too. And today many winners just aren't worth the risk reward to make a bet. Good price horses can't be played at random and within RDSS or any Sartin Factor must be within the top 3.
Two weeks ago I played a contest and in a contest your forced to play only one horse. Well I had 8 alternate horses win and 3 were at very nice odds. I was freaking out about this from a contest point of view but played two horses to win with actual betting money and made a nice profit for the day. If I put the work in such as doing a race or races for a contest I always bet my selections.
I wish you great success wallyHeitz on your journey with Sartin concepts. He has done an unbelievable amount of research that took many years, I hope you take advantage of all his hard lessons learned.
Mitch44
|