Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post

omar · 03-10-2020, 04:03 AM

Now you see Servis and Max Security's true colors. I've been telling you all along I didn't believe in this horse and now I feel vindicated. Why am I not surprised? Most crooks will go for the big price on a horse race fix but apparently he's gone for the big purse bucks and stud fees. Sheer arrogance feeling he'll never get caught. His big mistake was running him in a 16 mcl race to begin with instead of a msw. He raised a lot of eyebrows bumping him up to Gr 1 company and never looking back. I don't believe the horse was juiced until that Florida derby race. When your're the lone speed in a race you're supposed to win off by yourself but in that race he beat the 2nd horse by a lot who in turn beat the rest of the field by a lot. I wouldn't be surprised if both of those horses were drugged. Don't forget the 2nd horse was 71-1 under a 7-1 shot. To me that race never looked right and it still doesn't. Maidens should not be allowed in grade 1 races period.....! When something doesn't look right to me I question it. For you newbies who were born in the eighties or later, I was at the track back in 1976 or 1977, either Aqu or Belmont, i forget. i'm looking at the form for the last race of the day and i see this horse who ran last or next to last in all of his 10 pp's at odds of 60-1 or higher EXCEPT for his last race where he went off at 10-1 odds and still ran last. I'm talking finishing no closer than 20 lengths in all of his races. On that day the horse goes off at 50-1. This was a rock bottom claiming race on the grass. And i'm looking and looking to see if i could find the reason why a horse like that would go off at low odds in the last. I could not and on that one angle alone i almost bet this horse wps but instead i passed the race. I stood by the monitor and watched the race. This horse had 20 lengths lead on the rest of the field going into the far turn and never came back to the field and won by 20+ lengths. This horse looked like the 2nd coming of Secretariat, i kid you not. This horse was not drugged either. The only problem was the horse listed in the form, i forget his name , was not the horse who ran that day. The real name of the horse who won was CINZANO, the trainer was Morgan and the owner was Bernie Taub and the vet was in on the scam too. That's right, they killed their real horse and put in a ringer. I heard from a reliable source that worked on the backstretch that the trainer had a falling out with his girlfriend. He made her believe they were going with the horse the race before and it was her money that caused the horse to come down to 10-1. When the horse won at 50-1 she went to the track authorities and spilled the beans. Look it up online. I never believed the official story about a photographer in South America who saw a photograph of the horse in the winners circle in the age of no computers or internet and called authorities.. When something doesn't look right it usually isn't.

03-10-2020, 04:03 AM	#6
omar Grade 1 Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 378	Now you see Servis and Max Security's true colors. I've been telling you all along I didn't believe in this horse and now I feel vindicated. Why am I not surprised? Most crooks will go for the big price on a horse race fix but apparently he's gone for the big purse bucks and stud fees. Sheer arrogance feeling he'll never get caught. His big mistake was running him in a 16 mcl race to begin with instead of a msw. He raised a lot of eyebrows bumping him up to Gr 1 company and never looking back. I don't believe the horse was juiced until that Florida derby race. When your're the lone speed in a race you're supposed to win off by yourself but in that race he beat the 2nd horse by a lot who in turn beat the rest of the field by a lot. I wouldn't be surprised if both of those horses were drugged. Don't forget the 2nd horse was 71-1 under a 7-1 shot. To me that race never looked right and it still doesn't. Maidens should not be allowed in grade 1 races period.....! When something doesn't look right to me I question it. For you newbies who were born in the eighties or later, I was at the track back in 1976 or 1977, either Aqu or Belmont, i forget. i'm looking at the form for the last race of the day and i see this horse who ran last or next to last in all of his 10 pp's at odds of 60-1 or higher EXCEPT for his last race where he went off at 10-1 odds and still ran last. I'm talking finishing no closer than 20 lengths in all of his races. On that day the horse goes off at 50-1. This was a rock bottom claiming race on the grass. And i'm looking and looking to see if i could find the reason why a horse like that would go off at low odds in the last. I could not and on that one angle alone i almost bet this horse wps but instead i passed the race. I stood by the monitor and watched the race. This horse had 20 lengths lead on the rest of the field going into the far turn and never came back to the field and won by 20+ lengths. This horse looked like the 2nd coming of Secretariat, i kid you not. This horse was not drugged either. The only problem was the horse listed in the form, i forget his name , was not the horse who ran that day. The real name of the horse who won was CINZANO, the trainer was Morgan and the owner was Bernie Taub and the vet was in on the scam too. That's right, they killed their real horse and put in a ringer. I heard from a reliable source that worked on the backstretch that the trainer had a falling out with his girlfriend. He made her believe they were going with the horse the race before and it was her money that caused the horse to come down to 10-1. When the horse won at 50-1 she went to the track authorities and spilled the beans. Look it up online. I never believed the official story about a photographer in South America who saw a photograph of the horse in the winners circle in the age of no computers or internet and called authorities.. When something doesn't look right it usually isn't.