|
I agree with Mitch that less is more. I prefer to see precision. One horse or maybe two like Conley and Parts do, but ideally with some rationale. Also, nobody bets every race. Post what you understand like the M4$ contests a few years ago...those were good examples of posting picks before races ran. Sure you will miss a lot. Posting the numbers of half the horses in a field, you will be posting the winners’ number frequently but so what. Did you really bypass the first two you listed and land on the third just because he was 12-1? Maybe.
Two horses max (ideally one, as per matching) with rationale. That carries the most weight for me. If you are betting exotics be specific. You have to respect precision over a range of possibilities even if more wrong than right.
Pook
|